Search a rule number or topic in circuit-court local rules and statewide UTCR. County filters select sources; they do not determine the court, venue or applicable law.
36 Oregon counties · 27 local rulebooks · 24 UTCR chapter PDFsMachine-extracted or machine-OCR source text, not independently validated legal requirements. Later amendments, case orders, exceptions, signatures, service, fees and deadlines require original-source review. Reserved and repealed chapters do not create requirements.
Reserved and repealed-only chapters are retained as such. Amendment and supplemental orders are searched separately because their extracted text may include deleted or superseded provisions. Some scans have machine OCR, visibly labeled and unreviewed. Remaining scans have original-source links only. Verify all text and amendment markings in the PDF.
Official local rules ↗ ·
Official current UTCR ↗
Search public rule numbers or topics. Leave out names, case numbers and private document text.
Stored source matches
PJO 24-09 Adopting CJO 23-028 Permitting Remote Proceedings — physical PDF page 4
PJO 24-09 Adopting CJO 23-028 Permitting Remote Proceedings · physical PDF page 4 ·
Page 4 – PJO 24-09 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 orders) may proceed in-person or by remote means as determined by the assigned judge. • Motions for Immediate Danger Orders o Family Law Facilitators will be available in-person to assist with forms. o Motions will be accepted at the accounting window Monday-Friday before 3:30 p.m. ▪ Motions filed prior to the deadline shall be scheduled for an in- person hearing on the day of filing. ▪ Motions filed after the deadline may be scheduled for an in- person hearing the next judicial day. • Status Conferences o The court will conduct status conferences and pretrial hearings as scheduled on all family law cases. Such proceedings may be conducted in-person or by remote means. • Settlement Conferences o May proceed in-person or by remote means with the selected judge at the Courthouse or other designated court facility. • Mediation Orientation o Mediation Orientation for parents in child custody cases…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T22:32:44.067349+00:00 · Publisher library classifies this order CURRENT on retrieval; operative status, amendments, rescissions and case applicability have not been independently legally reviewed.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 ae461aee0a41918ad62ae59adfc038710302e01dee0a8ff04bae93eb07ee4d53
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/Documents/24MARPJO24-09.pdf
PJO 24-09 Adopting CJO 23-028 Permitting Remote Proceedings — physical PDF page 3
PJO 24-09 Adopting CJO 23-028 Permitting Remote Proceedings · physical PDF page 3 ·
Page 3 – PJO 24-09 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 is being held in a DOC facility or an out of county jail, then by remote means. o Out-of-custody cases may proceed in-person or by remote means with the selected judge at the Courthouse or other designated court facility. • If you have questions about arraignments and other matters occurring at the Criminal Court Annex, please call 503-588-8489. • If you have further questions about settlement conferences or trials scheduled at a remote court facility or related calendaring, please call 503-588-5030. • If you have further questions about criminal calendaring, please contact the assigned judge’s office. d. CIVIL (Excluding Post-Conviction and Habeas): • Civil jury trials and bench trials shall be conducted in-person with the assigned judge. The assigned judge may allow portions of the trial to be conducted by remote means. • Status Conferences and Pretrial Hearings may be conducted in-person or…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T22:32:44.067349+00:00 · Publisher library classifies this order CURRENT on retrieval; operative status, amendments, rescissions and case applicability have not been independently legally reviewed.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 ae461aee0a41918ad62ae59adfc038710302e01dee0a8ff04bae93eb07ee4d53
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/Documents/24MARPJO24-09.pdf
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules — physical PDF page 4
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules · physical PDF page 4 · 2026
A-3 6. 25.030—ASSIGNMENT OF SPECIFIC JUDGE FOR RECEIVERSHIP; PRESUMPTION OF COMPLEX CASE Adopt a new rule regarding assignment of a receivership case to a specific judge and designation as a complex case. See related items B.3–B.5 and B.7–B.24. 7. 25.040—INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Adopt a new rule to require and govern initial case management conferences following appointment of a receiver. See related items B.3– B.6 and B.8–B.24. 8. 25.050—STATUS CONFERENCE Adopt a new rule regarding requests to schedule a status conference following appointment of a receiver. See related items B.3–B.7 and B.9– B.24. 9. 25.060—ALLOWED CLAIMS Adopt a new rule regarding allowed claims by creditors. See related items B.3–B.8 and B.10–B.24. 10. 25.070—INTERIM DISTRIBUTION Adopt a new rule regarding the allowance of interim distributions to creditors prior to the conclusion of a receivership case. See related items B.3–B.9 and B.11–B.24. 11. 25.080—BRIDGE OVER Adopt a new rule regarding automatic e…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T22:31:09.969140+00:00 · Chief Justice amendment order effective 2026-08-01; original amendment document, not consolidated rule text Only approved-change pages1-25 and out-of-cycle amendment pages94-101 are indexed. Disapproved proposals, deferred recommendations and administrative actions on pages26-93 and102-105 remain source context only. This packet is not consolidated rule text; dates differ by provision.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 4d3584770d44af58f80c4ebf07da611b26a865195202c369dba2f465261fb0a5
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/UTCR/CJO_2026-021.pdf
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules — physical PDF page 14
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules · physical PDF page 14 · 2026
A-13 2. 2.010—FORM OF DOCUMENTS Amended to remove the requirement to prepare pleadings, motions, and requested instructions with numbered lines. ACTION TAKEN No motion was made to change the committee’s preliminary recommendation of approval. Accordingly, by committee convention, the October 24, 2025, preliminary recommendation became the committee’s final recommendation of approval. EXPLANATION This proposal, submitted by Judge Matthew A. Rowan, Circuit Court Judge, Jackson County Circuit Court, amends UTCR 2.010(4) to remove the requirement that all pleadings, motions, and requested instructions be prepared with numbered lines. Prior to the fall 2025 meeting, the proponent provided the following written testimony: • The proposed changes eliminate the need for pleading paper. The requirement of pleading paper is outdated and does not align with federal pleading or Oregon appellate court briefing format requirements. In a digital age, requiring numbered pages serves no purpose. In fact…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T22:31:09.969140+00:00 · Chief Justice amendment order effective 2026-08-01; original amendment document, not consolidated rule text Only approved-change pages1-25 and out-of-cycle amendment pages94-101 are indexed. Disapproved proposals, deferred recommendations and administrative actions on pages26-93 and102-105 remain source context only. This packet is not consolidated rule text; dates differ by provision.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 4d3584770d44af58f80c4ebf07da611b26a865195202c369dba2f465261fb0a5
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/UTCR/CJO_2026-021.pdf
PJO 26-14 Disclosure of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Court Filings — physical PDF page 2
PJO 26-14 Disclosure of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Court Filings · physical PDF page 2 ·
2. Use of AI tools does not modify, diminish, or shift the obligations imposed by ORCP 17. Every filed document must be signed by an attorney of record or, if unrepresented, the party, and that signature certifies compliance with ORCP 17(C). 3. Because AI systems may generate inaccurate case law, incorrect quotations, or misapplied authority, the court requires: e All citations must correspond to actual, valid legal authorities. ¢ Quoted material must be checked against the source. e Parties must not rely on Al-generated summaries, headnotes, or paraphrases without confirming accuracy. 4. The court may require parties to produce copies of any cited authority. 5. The court may strike filings containing fabricated authority or significant inaccuracies and may impose sanctions under ORCP 17(D). 6. This Order applies to all filings, including motions, memoranda, pleadings, letters submitted to the court, and proposed orders. 7. This Order is effective immediately and remains in force until…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine OCR, unreviewed; recognition errors and lost amendment markings are possible. Verify the original PDF.
Captured 2026-10-18T22:32:44.067349+00:00 · Publisher library classifies this order CURRENT on retrieval; operative status, amendments, rescissions and case applicability have not been independently legally reviewed. Machine OCR generated 2026-10-18T22:59:06.138132+00:00 with tesseract v5.5.3.20260724; unreviewed recognition, layout and amendment-marking errors are possible.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_ocr_unreviewed
SHA-256 63038c4242e407e9330a26b7e384954035210a29df04bda072158b088ec4fcf0
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/Documents/MAR_PJO26-14.pdf
PJO 24-09 Adopting CJO 23-028 Permitting Remote Proceedings — physical PDF page 5
PJO 24-09 Adopting CJO 23-028 Permitting Remote Proceedings · physical PDF page 5 ·
Page 5 – PJO 24-09 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 i. JUVENILE: • Dependency proceedings shall be conducted in-person unless the judge assigned to the case or presiding over the hearing allows a participant to appear by remote means. • Termination of Parental Rights (TPR) proceedings shall be conducted in- person unless the judge assigned to the case or presiding over the hearing allows a participant to appear by remote means. • Delinquency proceedings shall be conducted in-person unless the judge assigned to the case or presiding over the hearing allows a participant to appear by remote means. • If you have further questions about Juvenile matters, please call 503-566- 2974. j. LANDLORD TENANT: • Forcible Entry and Detainer (FED) first appearances shall be conducted in- person unless the judge presiding over the hearing allows a participant to appear by remote means. An attorney may appear by remote means if they give notice to the court by 5…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T22:32:44.067349+00:00 · Publisher library classifies this order CURRENT on retrieval; operative status, amendments, rescissions and case applicability have not been independently legally reviewed.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 ae461aee0a41918ad62ae59adfc038710302e01dee0a8ff04bae93eb07ee4d53
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/Documents/24MARPJO24-09.pdf
PJO 26-14 Disclosure of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Court Filings — physical PDF page 1
PJO 26-14 Disclosure of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Court Filings · physical PDF page 1 ·
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF STATE OF OREGON FOR MARION COUNTY ) PRESIDING JUDGE ORDER In the Matter of: Disclosure of the Use of ) Artificial Intelligence in Court Filings ) 26MARPJO No. 26-14 ) PURPOSE: This Order governs the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools (including but not limited to large language models, AlI-assisted legal research tools, and AlI-drafted text) in documents submitted to this court. Its purpose is to ensure accuracy, maintain the integrity of the judicial process, and reinforce counsel’s professional obligations. Al-assisted tools may be used for research, drafting, or summarization, but they do not replace the professional judgment, independent verification, or legal obligations of counsel or self-represented litigants. Users must review and confirm the accuracy of any Al-generated text, citations, or legal authority. I HEREBY FIND THAT: ORCP 17 provides that when an attorney or party signs or submits a pleading, motion, or similar document, they …
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine OCR, unreviewed; recognition errors and lost amendment markings are possible. Verify the original PDF.
Captured 2026-10-18T22:32:44.067349+00:00 · Publisher library classifies this order CURRENT on retrieval; operative status, amendments, rescissions and case applicability have not been independently legally reviewed. Machine OCR generated 2026-10-18T22:59:06.138132+00:00 with tesseract v5.5.3.20260724; unreviewed recognition, layout and amendment-marking errors are possible.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_ocr_unreviewed
SHA-256 63038c4242e407e9330a26b7e384954035210a29df04bda072158b088ec4fcf0
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/Documents/MAR_PJO26-14.pdf
PJO 24-09 Adopting CJO 23-028 Permitting Remote Proceedings — physical PDF page 2
PJO 24-09 Adopting CJO 23-028 Permitting Remote Proceedings · physical PDF page 2 ·
Page 2 – PJO 24-09 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 • Headache • New loss of taste or smell • Sore throat • Congestion or runny nose • Nausea or vomiting • Diarrhea If you have tested positive for COVID-19 and are still experiencing fever and consistent symptoms, please stay home and contact the court at 503-588-5632 or the lawyer requesting your appearance for further instructions. 2. Mode and location of proceedings a. JURY DUTY: • If you have been summoned for Jury Duty, please call the number on your juror summons after 5:00 p.m. the day before you are summoned to report to find out if you need to appear for service. If you are in a “high risk” group as defined by the CDC (https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/need-extra- precautions/people-with-medical-conditions.html) or are currently experiencing symptoms of COVID-19, please contact the jury office at MAR.Jury@ojd.state.or.us, the preferred contact method, or by telephone at 503-588-…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T22:32:44.067349+00:00 · Publisher library classifies this order CURRENT on retrieval; operative status, amendments, rescissions and case applicability have not been independently legally reviewed.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 ae461aee0a41918ad62ae59adfc038710302e01dee0a8ff04bae93eb07ee4d53
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/Documents/24MARPJO24-09.pdf