CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules — physical PDF page 14
A-13 2. 2.010—FORM OF DOCUMENTS Amended to remove the requirement to prepare pleadings, motions, and requested instructions with numbered lines. ACTION TAKEN No motion was made to change the committee’s preliminary recommendation of approval. Accordingly, by committee convention, the October 24, 2025, preliminary recommendation became the committee’s final recommendation of approval. EXPLANATION This proposal, submitted by Judge Matthew A. Rowan, Circuit Court Judge, Jackson County Circuit Court, amends UTCR 2.010(4) to remove the requirement that all pleadings, motions, and requested instructions be prepared with numbered lines. Prior to the fall 2025 meeting, the proponent provided the following written testimony: • The proposed changes eliminate the need for pleading paper. The requirement of pleading paper is outdated and does not align with federal pleading or Oregon appellate court briefing format requirements. In a digital age, requiring numbered pages serves no purpose. In fact, most pleadings submitted by litigants do not align with the numbers on the pleading paper. Further, and more importantly, the pleading numbers (and often, lines included that separate the line numbers from text body) disrupt Optical Character Recognition (OCR) scanning, making it very difficult to turn a PDF submitted to the court into an editable Word document. By eliminating the line numbers from a pleading, documents can be easily scanned and converted from PDFs to Word documents; this will allow litigants and the court to be more efficient in creating new documents out of those on record with the court through basic document conversion software (e.g., Adobe). • The proposed changes require uniformity of font and text size. This brings the font type and size requirements into alignment with the requirements for appellate briefings. In sum, the proposed changes are designed to increase uniformity across Oregon courts and modernize pleading forms for the 21st Century in which electronic filing rules the day. At the fall 2025 meeting, the committee discussed the following: • Numbered lines hinder PDF‑to‑Word conversion and can interfere with accessibility tools. • Removing numbered lines improves readability.
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 4d3584770d44af58f80c4ebf07da611b26a865195202c369dba2f465261fb0a5
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/UTCR/CJO_2026-021.pdf