Oregon court rules & publisher orders

Search a rule number or topic in circuit-court local rules and statewide UTCR. County filters select sources; they do not determine the court, venue or applicable law.

36 Oregon counties · 27 local rulebooks · 24 UTCR chapter PDFs

Machine-extracted or machine-OCR source text, not independently validated legal requirements. Later amendments, case orders, exceptions, signatures, service, fees and deadlines require original-source review. Reserved and repealed chapters do not create requirements.

Reserved and repealed-only chapters are retained as such. Amendment and supplemental orders are searched separately because their extracted text may include deleted or superseded provisions. Some scans have machine OCR, visibly labeled and unreviewed. Remaining scans have original-source links only. Verify all text and amendment markings in the PDF.

Official local rules ↗ · Official current UTCR ↗

2432 indexed entries · 167 publisher order documents · county orders in 30 counties

County coverage and remaining source gaps

All 36 counties have a mapped SLR rulebook. Supplemental orders remain incomplete. A zero below means no retained order in this collection; it does not mean that the court has no orders. OCR counts are machine-recognized documents, not legal review.

CountyNumbered SLR entriesCounty order PDFsOCR order PDFsSource-only order PDFs
Baker32320
Benton42110
Clackamas80833
Clatsop49100
Columbia18200
Coos3927913
Crook44101
Curry3926913
Deschutes3616213
Douglas56915
Gilliam22000
Grant132200
Harney132100
Hood River22000
Jackson621000
Jefferson44101
Josephine66100
Klamath55100
Lake37000
Lane68100
Lincoln64200
Linn30531
Malheur61110
Marion63310
Morrow89500
Multnomah210100
Polk401516
Sherman22000
Tillamook59210
Umatilla89400
Union65100
Wallowa65100
Wasco22000
Washington5825111
Wheeler22000
Yamhill52100

Search public rule numbers or topics. Leave out names, case numbers and private document text.

Browse rule topics

CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules — physical PDF page 14

CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules · physical PDF page 14 · 2026

A-13 
2. 2.010—FORM OF DOCUMENTS  
 
 Amended to remove the requirement to prepare pleadings, motions, and 
requested instructions with numbered lines. 
 
ACTION TAKEN 
No motion was made to change the committee’s preliminary 
recommendation of approval.  Accordingly, by committee convention, the 
October 24, 2025, preliminary recommendation became the committee’s 
final recommendation of approval. 
 
EXPLANATION 
This proposal, submitted by Judge Matthew A. Rowan, Circuit Court Judge, 
Jackson County Circuit Court, amends UTCR 2.010(4) to remove the 
requirement that all pleadings, motions, and requested instructions be 
prepared with numbered lines. 
 
Prior to the fall 2025 meeting, the proponent provided the following written 
testimony: 
• The proposed changes eliminate the need for pleading paper.  The 
requirement of pleading paper is outdated and does not align with 
federal pleading or Oregon appellate court briefing format requirements.  
In a digital age, requiring numbered pages serves no purpose.  In fact, 
most pleadings submitted by litigants do not align with the numbers on 
the pleading paper.  Further, and more importantly, the pleading 
numbers (and often, lines included that separate the line numbers from 
text body) disrupt Optical Character Recognition (OCR) scanning, 
making it very difficult to turn a PDF submitted to the court into an 
editable Word document.  By eliminating the line numbers from a 
pleading, documents can be easily scanned and converted from PDFs 
to Word documents; this will allow litigants and the court to be more 
efficient in creating new documents out of those on record with the court 
through basic document conversion software (e.g., Adobe). 
• The proposed changes require uniformity of font and text size.  This 
brings the font type and size requirements into alignment with the 
requirements for appellate briefings.  In sum, the proposed changes are 
designed to increase uniformity across Oregon courts and modernize 
pleading forms for the 21st Century in which electronic filing rules the 
day. 
 
At the fall 2025 meeting, the committee discussed the following: 
• Numbered lines hinder PDF‑to‑Word conversion and can interfere with 
accessibility tools. 
• Removing numbered lines improves readability.

Open publisher PDF at this page ↗

Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.

Captured 2026-10-18T22:31:09.969140+00:00 · Chief Justice amendment order effective 2026-08-01; original amendment document, not consolidated rule text Only approved-change pages1-25 and out-of-cycle amendment pages94-101 are indexed. Disapproved proposals, deferred recommendations and administrative actions on pages26-93 and102-105 remain source context only. This packet is not consolidated rule text; dates differ by provision.

Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.

Source provenance

machine_extracted_unreviewed

SHA-256 4d3584770d44af58f80c4ebf07da611b26a865195202c369dba2f465261fb0a5

Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/UTCR/CJO_2026-021.pdf