PJO 26-14 Disclosure of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Court Filings — physical PDF page 2
2. Use of AI tools does not modify, diminish, or shift the obligations imposed by ORCP 17. Every filed document must be signed by an attorney of record or, if unrepresented, the party, and that signature certifies compliance with ORCP 17(C). 3. Because AI systems may generate inaccurate case law, incorrect quotations, or misapplied authority, the court requires: e All citations must correspond to actual, valid legal authorities. ¢ Quoted material must be checked against the source. e Parties must not rely on Al-generated summaries, headnotes, or paraphrases without confirming accuracy. 4. The court may require parties to produce copies of any cited authority. 5. The court may strike filings containing fabricated authority or significant inaccuracies and may impose sanctions under ORCP 17(D). 6. This Order applies to all filings, including motions, memoranda, pleadings, letters submitted to the court, and proposed orders. 7. This Order is effective immediately and remains in force until modified or rescinded. Dated: 5/26/2026 2:20:50 PM Lim es Edmonds, Circuit Court Judge Page 2 — PJO 26-14
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_ocr_unreviewed
SHA-256 63038c4242e407e9330a26b7e384954035210a29df04bda072158b088ec4fcf0
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/Documents/MAR_PJO26-14.pdf