Search a rule number or topic in circuit-court local rules and statewide UTCR. County filters select sources; they do not determine the court, venue or applicable law.
36 Oregon counties · 27 local rulebooks · 24 UTCR chapter PDFsMachine-extracted or machine-OCR source text, not independently validated legal requirements. Later amendments, case orders, exceptions, signatures, service, fees and deadlines require original-source review. Reserved and repealed chapters do not create requirements.
Reserved and repealed-only chapters are retained as such. Amendment and supplemental orders are searched separately because their extracted text may include deleted or superseded provisions. Some scans have machine OCR, visibly labeled and unreviewed. Remaining scans have original-source links only. Verify all text and amendment markings in the PDF.
Official local rules ↗ ·
Official current UTCR ↗
Search public rule numbers or topics. Leave out names, case numbers and private document text.
Stored source matches
PJO 24-09 Adopting CJO 23-028 Permitting Remote Proceedings — physical PDF page 6
PJO 24-09 Adopting CJO 23-028 Permitting Remote Proceedings · physical PDF page 6 ·
Page 6 – PJO 24-09 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 • Protective Order applications, motions, and renewals (Family Abuse Prevention Act, Elderly Person and Persons with Disabilities Prevention Act, Sexual Abuse Protection Orders, Extreme Risk Protection Orders, and Stalking Orders) will be accepted at the accounting window each day: o Petitions filed by 11:00 a.m. shall be scheduled for an in-person hearing at 1:30 on the day of filing. o Petitions filed after 11:00 a.m. shall be scheduled for an in-person hearing at 1:30 the next judicial day. • Initial ex-parte hearings shall be conducted in-person unless the judge assigned to the case or presiding over the hearing allows a participant to appear by remote means. • Contested hearings shall be conducted in-person unless the judge assigned to the case or presiding over the hearing allows a participant to appear by remote means. In-custody parties shall appear by remote means. Court staff will ma…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T22:32:44.067349+00:00 · Publisher library classifies this order CURRENT on retrieval; operative status, amendments, rescissions and case applicability have not been independently legally reviewed.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 ae461aee0a41918ad62ae59adfc038710302e01dee0a8ff04bae93eb07ee4d53
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/Documents/24MARPJO24-09.pdf
Court visitor order: Marion (09.22.2025).pdf — physical PDF page 2
Court visitor order: Marion (09.22.2025).pdf · physical PDF page 2 ·
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PRESIDING JUDGE ORDER b) Shadow a current Visitor on 1 occasion prior to being assigned a case of their own, after which a current Visitor shall shadow the new Visitor for 1 case and provide feedback to the court. c) Attend and observe 1 protective proceeding hearings at earliest convenience. d) Complete Language Line training. 3) Visitors shall utilize the following standards and procedures in the performance of their duties: a) Visitors shall interview the respondent/protected person in-person. b) Visitors shall conduct interviews of all persons deemed by the visitor to have relevant information. c) Visitors shall review all relevant records regarding the respondent, to the extent such records are available. d) Visitors shall comply with ORS 125.150. e) The Visitor’s report shall comply with ORS 125.155, using the form required by UTCR 9.400 and/or Supplemental Local Rule, if applicable. f) The Visitor shall b…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T23:01:50.110212+00:00 · Retained from official OJD county-specific court visitor library. Library dates are document labels, not verified effective dates; operative status and case applicability remain unreviewed.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 e2fc88e3e895ba53c32aaf98a19de53f2bfe501375964605e82fb83d2c826df2
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/programs/family/guardianship-conservatorship/Documents/Marion%20(09.22.2025).pdf
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules — physical PDF page 24
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules · physical PDF page 24 · 2026
A-23 7. 18.040—FORM OF ORDER OR JUDGMENT Adopted a new rule regarding requirements for the form of a proposed order or judgment filed in an FED action. See related items A.4–A.6. ACTION TAKEN No motion was made to change the committee’s preliminary recommendation of approval. Accordingly, by committee convention, the October 24, 2025, preliminary recommendation became the committee’s final recommendation of approval. EXPLANATION See also the background explanation for related item A.4. The new rule imposes requirements for the form of a proposed order or judgment filed in an eviction action. At the fall 2025 meeting, the proponent provided the following testimony: • Whether an eviction action is subject to ORS chapter 90 is ultimately a legal determination. Plaintiffs sometimes mistakenly assert that an action is subject to ORS chapter 90 and defendants sometimes dispute the plaintiff’s assertion. It is important that the court determine whether an action is in fact subject to ORS chap…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T22:31:09.969140+00:00 · Chief Justice amendment order effective 2026-08-01; original amendment document, not consolidated rule text Only approved-change pages1-25 and out-of-cycle amendment pages94-101 are indexed. Disapproved proposals, deferred recommendations and administrative actions on pages26-93 and102-105 remain source context only. This packet is not consolidated rule text; dates differ by provision.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 4d3584770d44af58f80c4ebf07da611b26a865195202c369dba2f465261fb0a5
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/UTCR/CJO_2026-021.pdf
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules — physical PDF page 7
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules · physical PDF page 7 · 2026
A-6 32. 26.070—APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT BY TRIBUNAL Adopt a new rule regarding approval of agreements resulting from a collaborative law process. See related items B.25–B.31 and B.33–B.44. 33. 26.080—DISQUALIFICATION OF COLLABORATIVE LAWYER AND LAWYERS IN ASSOCIATED LAW FIRM Adopt a new rule regarding disqualification of a collaborative lawyer. See related items B.25–B.32 and B.34–B.44. 34. 26.090—LOW -INCOME PARTIES Adopt a new rule regarding representation of parties who are indigent. See related items B.25–B.33 and B.35–B.44. 35. 26.100—GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY AS PARTY Adopt a new rule regarding the representation of a party that is a government or governmental subdivision, agency, or instrumentality. See related items B.25–B.34 and B.36–B.44. 36. 26.110—DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION Adopt a new rule regarding the disclosure of information related to a collaborative matter during the collaborative law process. See related items B.25–B.35 and B.37–B.44. 37. 26.120—STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL REPO…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T22:31:09.969140+00:00 · Chief Justice amendment order effective 2026-08-01; original amendment document, not consolidated rule text Only approved-change pages1-25 and out-of-cycle amendment pages94-101 are indexed. Disapproved proposals, deferred recommendations and administrative actions on pages26-93 and102-105 remain source context only. This packet is not consolidated rule text; dates differ by provision.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 4d3584770d44af58f80c4ebf07da611b26a865195202c369dba2f465261fb0a5
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/UTCR/CJO_2026-021.pdf
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules — physical PDF page 21
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules · physical PDF page 21 · 2026
A-20 4. 18.010—DEFINITION Adopted a definition of “eviction action” for purposes of proposed new rules UTCR 18.020 to 18.040. See related items A.5–A.7. ACTION TAKEN No motion was made to change the committee’s preliminary recommendation of approval. Accordingly, by committee convention, the October 24, 2025, preliminary recommendation became the committee’s final recommendation of approval. EXPLANATION Background. These new rules, UTCR 18.010 to 18.040, were proposed by Danielle Ramos, Legal Policy Advisor for OJD’s Civil and Criminal Programs Division, to align court processes with Oregon law. Under ORS 105.164, OJD must annually set aside judgments and seal court records in forcible entry and detainer (FED) cases that meet statutory criteria. This law, effective in 2023, applies retroactively to judgments entered on or after January 1, 2014. Since 2023, OJD has worked to develop a centralized, automated process to identify eligible FED cases. Progress has been delayed because many F…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T22:31:09.969140+00:00 · Chief Justice amendment order effective 2026-08-01; original amendment document, not consolidated rule text Only approved-change pages1-25 and out-of-cycle amendment pages94-101 are indexed. Disapproved proposals, deferred recommendations and administrative actions on pages26-93 and102-105 remain source context only. This packet is not consolidated rule text; dates differ by provision.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 4d3584770d44af58f80c4ebf07da611b26a865195202c369dba2f465261fb0a5
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/UTCR/CJO_2026-021.pdf
Court visitor order: Marion (09.22.2025).pdf — physical PDF page 1
Court visitor order: Marion (09.22.2025).pdf · physical PDF page 1 ·
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PRESIDING JUDGE ORDER IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF STATE OF OREGON FOR MARION COUNTY In the Matter of Establishing Qualifications and Standards for Court Visitors ) ) ) ) ) PRESIDING JUDGE ORDER 25MARPJO No. 25-09 Pursuant to ORS 125.165, 125.170(1)(2) and UTCR 9.400 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1) Visitors shall have the following qualifications: a) A license in good standing in any state as any of the following: licensed professional counselor, licensed marriage and family therapist, licensed clinical social worker, registered nurse, or attorney; or b) Post-graduate degree (e.g. MSW, MSN, other master’s degree, J.D.); and c) At least two years of relevant experience. d) Complete the Fiduciary Training required for non-professional fiduciaries under 23MARPJO NO. 23-16, Guardian Partners. e) Have no felony convictions and no misdemeanor convictions for crimes involving truth or veracity. f) Have the training and expert…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T23:01:50.110212+00:00 · Retained from official OJD county-specific court visitor library. Library dates are document labels, not verified effective dates; operative status and case applicability remain unreviewed.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 e2fc88e3e895ba53c32aaf98a19de53f2bfe501375964605e82fb83d2c826df2
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/programs/family/guardianship-conservatorship/Documents/Marion%20(09.22.2025).pdf
PJO 26-14 Disclosure of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Court Filings — physical PDF page 2
PJO 26-14 Disclosure of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Court Filings · physical PDF page 2 ·
2. Use of AI tools does not modify, diminish, or shift the obligations imposed by ORCP 17. Every filed document must be signed by an attorney of record or, if unrepresented, the party, and that signature certifies compliance with ORCP 17(C). 3. Because AI systems may generate inaccurate case law, incorrect quotations, or misapplied authority, the court requires: e All citations must correspond to actual, valid legal authorities. ¢ Quoted material must be checked against the source. e Parties must not rely on Al-generated summaries, headnotes, or paraphrases without confirming accuracy. 4. The court may require parties to produce copies of any cited authority. 5. The court may strike filings containing fabricated authority or significant inaccuracies and may impose sanctions under ORCP 17(D). 6. This Order applies to all filings, including motions, memoranda, pleadings, letters submitted to the court, and proposed orders. 7. This Order is effective immediately and remains in force until…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine OCR, unreviewed; recognition errors and lost amendment markings are possible. Verify the original PDF.
Captured 2026-10-18T22:32:44.067349+00:00 · Publisher library classifies this order CURRENT on retrieval; operative status, amendments, rescissions and case applicability have not been independently legally reviewed. Machine OCR generated 2026-10-18T22:59:06.138132+00:00 with tesseract v5.5.3.20260724; unreviewed recognition, layout and amendment-marking errors are possible.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_ocr_unreviewed
SHA-256 63038c4242e407e9330a26b7e384954035210a29df04bda072158b088ec4fcf0
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/Documents/MAR_PJO26-14.pdf
PJO 24-09 Adopting CJO 23-028 Permitting Remote Proceedings — physical PDF page 7
PJO 24-09 Adopting CJO 23-028 Permitting Remote Proceedings · physical PDF page 7 ·
Page 7 – PJO 24-09 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 q. TRAFFIC: • Traffic first appearances are being handled by phone, online or by mail. On or before the date you are directed to appear on your citation, you must enter a plea: o If you wish to plea “Not Guilty”: ▪ Call 503-588-8489 option 6, or ▪ Mail in your response requesting a trial. o If you wish to plea “No Contest”: ▪ Call 1-888-564-2828, or ▪ Enter your “No Contest” plea on-line ONLY IF you are paying in full at: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/services/online/Pages/epay.aspx ▪ Mail your payment to the address on your citation. • Traffic trials shall be conducted in-person. The judge presiding over the trial may allow parties and witnesses to appear by remote means upon request. • Individuals can make payments online at https://www.courts.oregon.gov/services/online/Pages/epay.aspx • If you have further questions about Traffic cases, please call 503-588-8489. r. OTHER COURT PROCEEDINGS: …
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T22:32:44.067349+00:00 · Publisher library classifies this order CURRENT on retrieval; operative status, amendments, rescissions and case applicability have not been independently legally reviewed.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 ae461aee0a41918ad62ae59adfc038710302e01dee0a8ff04bae93eb07ee4d53
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/Documents/24MARPJO24-09.pdf