Oregon court rules & publisher orders

Search a rule number or topic in circuit-court local rules and statewide UTCR. County filters select sources; they do not determine the court, venue or applicable law.

36 Oregon counties · 27 local rulebooks · 24 UTCR chapter PDFs

Machine-extracted or machine-OCR source text, not independently validated legal requirements. Later amendments, case orders, exceptions, signatures, service, fees and deadlines require original-source review. Reserved and repealed chapters do not create requirements.

Reserved and repealed-only chapters are retained as such. Amendment and supplemental orders are searched separately because their extracted text may include deleted or superseded provisions. Some scans have machine OCR, visibly labeled and unreviewed. Remaining scans have original-source links only. Verify all text and amendment markings in the PDF.

Official local rules ↗ · Official current UTCR ↗

2432 indexed entries · 167 publisher order documents · county orders in 30 counties

County coverage and remaining source gaps

All 36 counties have a mapped SLR rulebook. Supplemental orders remain incomplete. A zero below means no retained order in this collection; it does not mean that the court has no orders. OCR counts are machine-recognized documents, not legal review.

CountyNumbered SLR entriesCounty order PDFsOCR order PDFsSource-only order PDFs
Baker32320
Benton42110
Clackamas80833
Clatsop49100
Columbia18200
Coos3927913
Crook44101
Curry3926913
Deschutes3616213
Douglas56915
Gilliam22000
Grant132200
Harney132100
Hood River22000
Jackson621000
Jefferson44101
Josephine66100
Klamath55100
Lake37000
Lane68100
Lincoln64200
Linn30531
Malheur61110
Marion63310
Morrow89500
Multnomah210100
Polk401516
Sherman22000
Tillamook59210
Umatilla89400
Union65100
Wallowa65100
Wasco22000
Washington5825111
Wheeler22000
Yamhill52100

Search public rule numbers or topics. Leave out names, case numbers and private document text.

Browse rule topics

Stored source matches

CJO 2026-019 — Approving Out-of-Cycle Amendment of Uniform Trial Court Rule 4.130 — physical PDF page 2

CJO 2026-019 — Approving Out-of-Cycle Amendment of Uniform Trial Court Rule 4.130 · physical PDF page 2 · 2026

A–1 ATTACHMENT A TO CJO NO. 26-019 4.130 CAPTION REQUIREMENT FOR REFILED CHARGING INSTRUMENTS In addition to any other requirements imposed by statute or rule, [if]{when} a prosecuting attorney files a charging instrument [that ]initiat[es]{ing} a criminal action [and is ]based on charges previously dismissed without prejudice by the court[,]{:}[ the caption of the charging instrument must include the phrase: “Refiling after prior dismissal without prejudice.”] {(1) The caption must include the phrase: “Refiling after prior dismissal without prejudice;” and (2) The charging instrument must be filed as a new case and may not be filed into the previously dismissed criminal case.}

Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt

Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.

Captured 2026-10-18T22:31:16.855807+00:00 · Chief Justice amendment order effective 2026-07-01; original amendment document, not consolidated rule text

Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.

Source provenance

machine_extracted_unreviewed

SHA-256 67e16f9c313894f0d3a4e9b0d609b32d8e2e5d444e0a15a0b6298f5cd7867cc8

Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/UTCR/CJO_2026-019.pdf

PJO 26-14 Disclosure of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Court Filings — physical PDF page 2

PJO 26-14 Disclosure of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Court Filings · physical PDF page 2 ·

2. Use of AI tools does not modify, diminish, or shift the obligations imposed by ORCP 17. Every filed document must be signed by an attorney of record or, if unrepresented, the party, and that signature certifies compliance with ORCP 17(C). 3. Because AI systems may generate inaccurate case law, incorrect quotations, or misapplied authority, the court requires: e All citations must correspond to actual, valid legal authorities. ¢ Quoted material must be checked against the source. e Parties must not rely on Al-generated summaries, headnotes, or paraphrases without confirming accuracy. 4. The court may require parties to produce copies of any cited authority. 5. The court may strike filings containing fabricated authority or significant inaccuracies and may impose sanctions under ORCP 17(D). 6. This Order applies to all filings, including motions, memoranda, pleadings, letters submitted to the court, and proposed orders. 7. This Order is effective immediately and remains in force until…

Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt

Machine OCR, unreviewed; recognition errors and lost amendment markings are possible. Verify the original PDF.

Captured 2026-10-18T22:32:44.067349+00:00 · Publisher library classifies this order CURRENT on retrieval; operative status, amendments, rescissions and case applicability have not been independently legally reviewed. Machine OCR generated 2026-10-18T22:59:06.138132+00:00 with tesseract v5.5.3.20260724; unreviewed recognition, layout and amendment-marking errors are possible.

Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.

Source provenance

machine_ocr_unreviewed

SHA-256 63038c4242e407e9330a26b7e384954035210a29df04bda072158b088ec4fcf0

Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/Documents/MAR_PJO26-14.pdf