Search a rule number or topic in circuit-court local rules and statewide UTCR. County filters select sources; they do not determine the court, venue or applicable law.
36 Oregon counties · 27 local rulebooks · 24 UTCR chapter PDFsMachine-extracted or machine-OCR source text, not independently validated legal requirements. Later amendments, case orders, exceptions, signatures, service, fees and deadlines require original-source review. Reserved and repealed chapters do not create requirements.
Reserved and repealed-only chapters are retained as such. Amendment and supplemental orders are searched separately because their extracted text may include deleted or superseded provisions. Some scans have machine OCR, visibly labeled and unreviewed. Remaining scans have original-source links only. Verify all text and amendment markings in the PDF.
Official local rules ↗ ·
Official current UTCR ↗
Search public rule numbers or topics. Leave out names, case numbers and private document text.
Stored source matches
In the Matter of Court Appearances, Alternate Locations and Finding Good Cause Regarding Appearances - Amended — physical PDF page 2
In the Matter of Court Appearances, Alternate Locations and Finding Good Cause Regarding Appearances - Amended · physical PDF page 2 ·
moving party the hearing will be held in-person. d. Civil commitment hearings may be conducted remotely unless required to be held in-person. e. Family Treatment Court may be conducted in-person or by remote means. f. Mental Health Court may be conducted in-person or by remote means. 3. Upon a showing of good cause, an assigned judge may grant a motion by a party, attorney, or witness to appear by remote means in proceedings and appearances that are conducted in-person. Compliance with ORS 45.400 is required. 4. Oral argument, if request in the pleadings, on civil motions under ORCP 21, ORCP 23, ORCP 36-49, case management motions under UTCR Chapter 7, and criminal motions that do not require testimony shall be conducted by remote/telecommunicate means. The party that requests oral argument must arrange and initiate the remote/telecommunication unless the court directs otherwise. 5. The Fifteenth Judicial District conducts trials at the courthouses in Coquille and Gold Beach. In the ev…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine OCR, unreviewed; recognition errors and lost amendment markings are possible. Verify the original PDF.
Captured 2026-10-18T23:00:01.762234+00:00 · Retained from official publisher listing. Operative status, amendments, rescissions, and case applicability remain unreviewed. Machine OCR generated 2026-10-18T23:03:56.153396+00:00 with tesseract v5.5.3.20260724; unreviewed recognition errors and lost layout/markings remain. Verify the original.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_ocr_unreviewed
SHA-256 909cec9de0dcca6cdf3a228432fc3aa074bdf03708f597b7a61bbfbbd6bb301a
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/courts/coos/resources/GeneralOrders/23-03 - In the Matter of Court Appearances, Alternate Locations and Finding Good Cause Regarding Appearances - Amended.pdf
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules — physical PDF page 4
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules · physical PDF page 4 · 2026
A-3 6. 25.030—ASSIGNMENT OF SPECIFIC JUDGE FOR RECEIVERSHIP; PRESUMPTION OF COMPLEX CASE Adopt a new rule regarding assignment of a receivership case to a specific judge and designation as a complex case. See related items B.3–B.5 and B.7–B.24. 7. 25.040—INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Adopt a new rule to require and govern initial case management conferences following appointment of a receiver. See related items B.3– B.6 and B.8–B.24. 8. 25.050—STATUS CONFERENCE Adopt a new rule regarding requests to schedule a status conference following appointment of a receiver. See related items B.3–B.7 and B.9– B.24. 9. 25.060—ALLOWED CLAIMS Adopt a new rule regarding allowed claims by creditors. See related items B.3–B.8 and B.10–B.24. 10. 25.070—INTERIM DISTRIBUTION Adopt a new rule regarding the allowance of interim distributions to creditors prior to the conclusion of a receivership case. See related items B.3–B.9 and B.11–B.24. 11. 25.080—BRIDGE OVER Adopt a new rule regarding automatic e…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T22:31:09.969140+00:00 · Chief Justice amendment order effective 2026-08-01; original amendment document, not consolidated rule text Only approved-change pages1-25 and out-of-cycle amendment pages94-101 are indexed. Disapproved proposals, deferred recommendations and administrative actions on pages26-93 and102-105 remain source context only. This packet is not consolidated rule text; dates differ by provision.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 4d3584770d44af58f80c4ebf07da611b26a865195202c369dba2f465261fb0a5
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/UTCR/CJO_2026-021.pdf
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules — physical PDF page 14
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules · physical PDF page 14 · 2026
A-13 2. 2.010—FORM OF DOCUMENTS Amended to remove the requirement to prepare pleadings, motions, and requested instructions with numbered lines. ACTION TAKEN No motion was made to change the committee’s preliminary recommendation of approval. Accordingly, by committee convention, the October 24, 2025, preliminary recommendation became the committee’s final recommendation of approval. EXPLANATION This proposal, submitted by Judge Matthew A. Rowan, Circuit Court Judge, Jackson County Circuit Court, amends UTCR 2.010(4) to remove the requirement that all pleadings, motions, and requested instructions be prepared with numbered lines. Prior to the fall 2025 meeting, the proponent provided the following written testimony: • The proposed changes eliminate the need for pleading paper. The requirement of pleading paper is outdated and does not align with federal pleading or Oregon appellate court briefing format requirements. In a digital age, requiring numbered pages serves no purpose. In fact…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T22:31:09.969140+00:00 · Chief Justice amendment order effective 2026-08-01; original amendment document, not consolidated rule text Only approved-change pages1-25 and out-of-cycle amendment pages94-101 are indexed. Disapproved proposals, deferred recommendations and administrative actions on pages26-93 and102-105 remain source context only. This packet is not consolidated rule text; dates differ by provision.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 4d3584770d44af58f80c4ebf07da611b26a865195202c369dba2f465261fb0a5
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/UTCR/CJO_2026-021.pdf
In the Matter of Setting an Expedited Parenting Plan Enforcement Procedure — physical PDF page 1
In the Matter of Setting an Expedited Parenting Plan Enforcement Procedure · physical PDF page 1 ·
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF cet Ee J FOR THE FIFTHTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICTS °° IN THE MATTER OF SETTING AN ) EXPEDITED PARENTING PLAN ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURE ORS 107.434 requires the presiding judge of a judicial district to enter an expedited parenting plan enforcement procedure; It is hereby ordered that upon filing of a motion for enforcement of a parenting time judgment under ORS 107.434, the clerk shall immediately deliver the motion, affidavit, and proposed order to a judge who shall direct the docketing clerk to set a hearing date within 45 days of the filing the motion after which the judge will sign the proposed order. Dated this 2nd day of September, 2014 at Coquille, Oregon. Richard L. Barron Presiding Judge
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine OCR, unreviewed; recognition errors and lost amendment markings are possible. Verify the original PDF.
Captured 2026-10-18T23:00:01.762234+00:00 · Retained from official publisher listing. Operative status, amendments, rescissions, and case applicability remain unreviewed. Machine OCR generated 2026-10-18T23:03:56.153396+00:00 with tesseract v5.5.3.20260724; unreviewed recognition errors and lost layout/markings remain. Verify the original.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_ocr_unreviewed
SHA-256 2541e99b8b81608553bb31639dac921373d567765fc841b850021ef896208087
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/courts/coos/resources/GeneralOrders/PJO 14-7 Expedited Parenting Plan Enforcement.pdf
In the Matter of Discovery of Personal Identifiers for Victims of Crime — physical PDF page 1
In the Matter of Discovery of Personal Identifiers for Victims of Crime · physical PDF page 1 ·
t- ilL[* IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT T|}$$FE8 .8 fitI 8g b3 rN THE MATTER OF DTSCOVERY OF ) PERSONAL |DENTTF|ERS FOR ) vrcTrMS oF cRtME ) .ENEML 'RDER _J gge,fifif; U $f#ff ' Dt-o\ This matter having come before the court at the request of Paul Frasier, District Attorney for Coos County, Oregon, regarding discovery of personal identifiers of victims of crime as defined in ORS 135.815(5Xa), and the court finding that ORS 135.815(3Xa) prohibits the District Attorney from disclosing personal identifiers of victims to crimes to unrepresented defendants without a court order and that ORS 135.81s(a)(a) prohibits a lawyer or the lawyer's representative from disclosing personal identifiers of victims of crimes to a defendant without a court order, and that each subsection provides how an unrepresented defendant or a lawyer for a defendant may request that such personal identifiers be disclosed: It is hereby ordered that in all criminal cases …
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T23:00:01.762234+00:00 · Retained from official publisher listing. Operative status, amendments, rescissions, and case applicability remain unreviewed.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 68283560bbf172a1be4f00e78f7fb3ab3bd8cf9e8fc79a4b196bb2580fa7cc5b
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/courts/coos/resources/GeneralOrders/08-01_discoverypersonalidcrimev.pdf
In the Matter of Disclosure of Personal Identifiers of Victims or Witnesses in Juvenile Delinquency Matters — physical PDF page 1
In the Matter of Disclosure of Personal Identifiers of Victims or Witnesses in Juvenile Delinquency Matters · physical PDF page 1 ·
rN THE oRcurr couRT oF THE srATE or UhEborrr FOR THE FTFTEENTH JUD|C|AL S$*SAr FH $ 5l -OCS li; ''-'^!fI;' i C0OUILLF ' ';H Lt'rtrr'; GENERAL ORDER 10-01 This matter having come before the court on the court's own motion regarding disclosure of personal identifiers (ORS 419C.276(6Xb)) of victims or witnesses in juvenile delinquency matters and the court finding that ORS 419C.276(1Xa) prohibits, unless authorized by the court, the attorney of a youth or youth offender, or an agent of the attorney, from disclosing personal identifiers of a victim or witness to a youth or youth offender. Therefore, it is ordered that in alljuvenile delinquency matters filed in the Fifteenth Judicial District on or after Janu ary 1, 2010 the attorney of the youth or youth offender, or an agent of the attorney, may not disclose to the youth or youth offender personal identifiers of a victim or witness unless the youth or youth offender's attorney files a motion with the court and the court makes the finding…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T23:00:01.762234+00:00 · Retained from official publisher listing. Operative status, amendments, rescissions, and case applicability remain unreviewed.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 5f8cd61f97a1a82ab66ac3e16e78d4569cb159ac7c8d63e2032dc152b6f4f4ff
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/courts/coos/resources/GeneralOrders/10-01_disclosureofpersonalid.pdf
In the Matter of Security Funds — physical PDF page 1
In the Matter of Security Funds · physical PDF page 1 ·
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT In the Matter of Security Funds General Order No. 24-01 This matter having come before the Court on its own motion; It appearing to the court that from time-to-time money is posted by persons arrested or other persons on behalf of persons arrested and released under a security release agreement; now, therefore: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: |. If a defendant appears at the date and time for arraignment and charges are not filed with the court, the money deposited with the court shall be applied pursuant to this order. ll. If no charges are filed, or if filed, dismissed before judgment, the security money deposited, after deduction for statutory assessment, shall be applied to other financial obligations owed to the court by the defendant. Ill. | After assessing the statutory assessment, and financial obligations imposed, if any, on charges filed as provided for in ORS 135.265(2), if money from the security deposit…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine OCR, unreviewed; recognition errors and lost amendment markings are possible. Verify the original PDF.
Captured 2026-10-18T23:00:01.762234+00:00 · Retained from official publisher listing. Operative status, amendments, rescissions, and case applicability remain unreviewed. Machine OCR generated 2026-10-18T23:03:56.153396+00:00 with tesseract v5.5.3.20260724; unreviewed recognition errors and lost layout/markings remain. Verify the original.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_ocr_unreviewed
SHA-256 5ac881303b099ba98473a9ffae7399067d717cc55df324b808b1f624a908e1eb
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/courts/coos/resources/GeneralOrders/24-01 - In the Matter of Security Funds.pdf
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules — physical PDF page 3
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules · physical PDF page 3 · 2026
A-2 2. 2.010—FORM OF DOCUMENTS Amended to remove the requirement to prepare pleadings, motions, and requested instructions with numbered lines. 3. 5.100—SUBMISSION OF PROPOSED ORDERS OR JUDGMENTS Amended to require parties to specify the rule or statutory basis upon which a submitted document is purported to be exempt from the advance service requirement imposed under the UTCR 5.100(1). 4. 18.010—DEFINITION Adopted a definition of “eviction action” for purposes of proposed new rules UTCR 18.020 to 18.040. See related items A.5–A.7. 5. 18.020—CAPTION Adopted a new rule regarding requirements for the caption of a complaint filed in a Forcible Entry and Detainer (FED) action. See related items A.4 and A.6–A.7. 6. 18.030—FORMAT OF COMPLAINT Adopted a new rule regarding requirements for the form of a complaint filed in an FED action. See related items A.4–A.5 and A.7. 7. 18.040—FORM OF ORDER OR JUDGMENT Adopted a new rule regarding requirements for the form of a proposed order or judgment f…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T22:31:09.969140+00:00 · Chief Justice amendment order effective 2026-08-01; original amendment document, not consolidated rule text Only approved-change pages1-25 and out-of-cycle amendment pages94-101 are indexed. Disapproved proposals, deferred recommendations and administrative actions on pages26-93 and102-105 remain source context only. This packet is not consolidated rule text; dates differ by provision.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 4d3584770d44af58f80c4ebf07da611b26a865195202c369dba2f465261fb0a5
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/UTCR/CJO_2026-021.pdf