Oregon court rules & publisher orders

Search a rule number or topic in circuit-court local rules and statewide UTCR. County filters select sources; they do not determine the court, venue or applicable law.

36 Oregon counties · 27 local rulebooks · 24 UTCR chapter PDFs

Machine-extracted or machine-OCR source text, not independently validated legal requirements. Later amendments, case orders, exceptions, signatures, service, fees and deadlines require original-source review. Reserved and repealed chapters do not create requirements.

Reserved and repealed-only chapters are retained as such. Amendment and supplemental orders are searched separately because their extracted text may include deleted or superseded provisions. Some scans have machine OCR, visibly labeled and unreviewed. Remaining scans have original-source links only. Verify all text and amendment markings in the PDF.

Official local rules ↗ · Official current UTCR ↗

2432 indexed entries · 167 publisher order documents · county orders in 30 counties

County coverage and remaining source gaps

All 36 counties have a mapped SLR rulebook. Supplemental orders remain incomplete. A zero below means no retained order in this collection; it does not mean that the court has no orders. OCR counts are machine-recognized documents, not legal review.

CountyNumbered SLR entriesCounty order PDFsOCR order PDFsSource-only order PDFs
Baker32320
Benton42110
Clackamas80833
Clatsop49100
Columbia18200
Coos3927913
Crook44101
Curry3926913
Deschutes3616213
Douglas56915
Gilliam22000
Grant132200
Harney132100
Hood River22000
Jackson621000
Jefferson44101
Josephine66100
Klamath55100
Lake37000
Lane68100
Lincoln64200
Linn30531
Malheur61110
Marion63310
Morrow89500
Multnomah210100
Polk401516
Sherman22000
Tillamook59210
Umatilla89400
Union65100
Wallowa65100
Wasco22000
Washington5825111
Wheeler22000
Yamhill52100

Search public rule numbers or topics. Leave out names, case numbers and private document text.

Browse rule topics

Stored source matches

UTCR 7.100 — DISQUALIFICATION MOTIONS UNDER ORS 14.260(7)

2026 Uniform Trial Court Rules — Chapter 7 · physical PDF page 6–7 · 2026

7.100 DISQUALIFICATION MOTIONS UNDER ORS 14.260(7) (1) A motion to disqualify a judge and supporting affidavit must be submitted in the manner described in ORS 14.260(1) through (6). (2) A challenged judge who believes that the disqualification motion, or a series of disqualification motions, filed under ORS 14.260(1) or ORS 14.270, effectively denies the judge assignment to a criminal or juvenile delinquency docket pursuant to ORS 14.260(7), may request a hearing by submitting a request for hearing form. The request for hearing form must: (a) Be submitted to the presiding judge (or the presiding judge’s designee, if the presiding judge is the subject of the challenge) within two judicial days of the filing of the disqualification motion; (b) State that the request for hearing is being submitted under ORS 14.260(7), regarding effective denial of judicial assignment to a criminal or juvenile delinquency docket; and 2026 UTCR 7.7 (c) Be served on each party to the case. (3) Within two ju…

Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt

Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.

Captured 2026-10-18T22:31:12.561456+00:00 · Published 2026 chapter effective 2026-08-01; apply with separately indexed amending Chief Justice Orders

Stored circuit-court rule excerpt. Read the complete rule, exceptions, current publisher version and actual case orders; applicability and deadlines are not established.

Source provenance

machine_extracted_unreviewed

SHA-256 96d41d02a03097c53ea38f44a6c693918c7e7b560dae5d2352b18d5663c5db8f

Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/UTCR/2026_UTCR_ch7.pdf

UTCR 23.020 — ASSIGNMENT OF CASES TO THE OCLC

2026 Uniform Trial Court Rules — Chapter 23 · physical PDF page 1–2 · 2026

23.020 ASSIGNMENT OF CASES TO THE OCLC (1) Assignment of a case to the OCLC requires agreement of the parties, the presiding judge or designee of the court with venue, and the managing panel of the OCLC. (2) The following must occur for a case to be considered for assignment to the OCLC: (a) The parties and the presiding judge or designee of the court with venue must confer to determine whether there is agreement to assign the case to the OCLC and to determine the special needs, facts, and issues of the case. (b) The presiding judge or designee of the court with venue and the managing panel of the OCLC must confer to discuss whether the case is appropriate for assignment to the OCLC and to discuss the special needs, facts, and issues of the case. (3) If the agreement required by UTCR 23.020(1) is reached and the managing panel accepts a case into the OCLC, the parties must submit a stipulated order for assignment of the case to the OCLC to the presiding judge or designee of the court w…

Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt

Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.

Captured 2026-10-18T22:31:16.783251+00:00 · Published 2026 chapter effective 2026-08-01; apply with separately indexed amending Chief Justice Orders

Stored circuit-court rule excerpt. Read the complete rule, exceptions, current publisher version and actual case orders; applicability and deadlines are not established.

Source provenance

machine_extracted_unreviewed

SHA-256 62f36912a5c774ba49e54779bee0f70d3d6b718bbec274646e68a4c127f98415

Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/UTCR/2026_UTCR_ch23.pdf

UTCR 13.080 — ASSIGNMENT TO ARBITRATOR

2026 Uniform Trial Court Rules — Chapter 13 · physical PDF page 3 · 2026

13.080 ASSIGNMENT TO ARBITRATOR (1) The parties may select an arbitrator by stipulation. (2) At the time of giving notice of the assignment to arbitration, the trial court administrator shall furnish a list of proposed arbitrators as well as a copy of the procedures for the selection of arbitrators and for setting an arbitration hearing. The procedures for selection of arbitrators shall be established by the arbitration commission. (3) An arbitrator shall be assigned under (1) or (2) of this rule within 21 days after the assignment to arbitration.

Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt

Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.

Captured 2026-10-18T22:31:14.543022+00:00 · Published 2026 chapter effective 2026-08-01; apply with separately indexed amending Chief Justice Orders

Stored circuit-court rule excerpt. Read the complete rule, exceptions, current publisher version and actual case orders; applicability and deadlines are not established.

Source provenance

machine_extracted_unreviewed

SHA-256 f64e46a75bd44c26ca421b4d67ba5fd653cc0d479bab915f1cf3d020e4603657

Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/UTCR/2026_UTCR_ch13.pdf

UTCR 13.100 — AUTHORITY OF ARBITRATORS

2026 Uniform Trial Court Rules — Chapter 13 · physical PDF page 3–4 · 2026

13.100 AUTHORITY OF ARBITRATORS An arbitrator has the authority to do all of the following, but may exercise the authority conferred only after the case is assigned to a specific arbitrator and any disputes over the assignment have been settled: (1) Decide procedural issues arising before or during the arbitration hearing, except issues relating to arbitrability or the qualification of an arbitrator. The court may 2026 UTCR 13.4 entertain a challenge to the qualification of an arbitrator on grounds that could not be discovered prior to assignment of the arbitrator to the case. (2) Invite, with reasonable notice, the parties to submit trial briefs. (3) After notice to the parties, examine any site or object relevant to the case. (4) Issue a subpoena, enforceable in the manner described in ORS 36.675. (5) Administer oath or affirmations to witnesses. (6) Rule on the admissibility of evidence in accordance with these rules. (7) Determine the facts, apply the law, and make an award; perfor…

Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt

Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.

Captured 2026-10-18T22:31:14.543022+00:00 · Published 2026 chapter effective 2026-08-01; apply with separately indexed amending Chief Justice Orders

Stored circuit-court rule excerpt. Read the complete rule, exceptions, current publisher version and actual case orders; applicability and deadlines are not established.

Source provenance

machine_extracted_unreviewed

SHA-256 f64e46a75bd44c26ca421b4d67ba5fd653cc0d479bab915f1cf3d020e4603657

Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/UTCR/2026_UTCR_ch13.pdf

UTCR 23.010 — OREGON COMPLEX LITIGATION COURT

2026 Uniform Trial Court Rules — Chapter 23 · physical PDF page 1 · 2026

23.010 OREGON COMPLEX LITIGATION COURT (1) The criteria used for assignment of a case to the Oregon Complex Litigation Court (OCLC), pursuant to UTCR 23.020, may include, but are not limited to, the number of parties, the complexity of the legal issues, the complexity of the factual issues, the complexity of discovery, and the anticipated length of trial. (2) The UTCR apply to cases in the OCLC except where the rules in this chapter specifically provide otherwise. (3) Absent a motion and order for a change of venue pursuant to ORS 14.110, assignment of a case to the OCLC does not change the venue of a case. (4) The OCLC will be managed by a panel of three circuit court presiding judges appointed by the Chief Justice of the Oregon Supreme Court.

Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt

Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.

Captured 2026-10-18T22:31:16.783251+00:00 · Published 2026 chapter effective 2026-08-01; apply with separately indexed amending Chief Justice Orders

Stored circuit-court rule excerpt. Read the complete rule, exceptions, current publisher version and actual case orders; applicability and deadlines are not established.

Source provenance

machine_extracted_unreviewed

SHA-256 62f36912a5c774ba49e54779bee0f70d3d6b718bbec274646e68a4c127f98415

Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/UTCR/2026_UTCR_ch23.pdf

UTCR 12.030 — DETERMINING AUTHORITY, DETERMINING MEDIATOR QUALIFICATIONS, OTHER RESPONSIBILITIES AND AUTHORITY

2026 Uniform Trial Court Rules — Chapter 12 · physical PDF page 3–4 · 2026

12.030 DETERMINING AUTHORITY, DETERMINING MEDIATOR QUALIFICATIONS, OTHER RESPONSIBILITIES AND AUTHORITY (1) The determining authority: (a) Is the entity within a judicial district with authority to determine whether applicants to become an approved mediator for courts within the judicial district meet the qualifications as described in these rules and whether approved mediators meet any continuing qualifications or obligations required by these rules. (b) Is the presiding judge of the judicial district unless the presiding judge has delegated the authority to be the determining authority as provided or allowed by statute. Delegation under this paragraph may be made to an entity chosen by the presiding judge to establish a mediation program as allowed by law or statute. A delegation must be in writing and, if it places any limitations on the presiding judge’s ultimate authority to review and change decisions made by the delegatee, must be approved by the State Court Administrator before…

Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt

Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.

Captured 2026-10-18T22:31:14.366876+00:00 · Published 2026 chapter effective 2026-08-01; apply with separately indexed amending Chief Justice Orders

Stored circuit-court rule excerpt. Read the complete rule, exceptions, current publisher version and actual case orders; applicability and deadlines are not established.

Source provenance

machine_extracted_unreviewed

SHA-256 a89f9f998642d51034709cb22dd69e2d015beb24f344786af458147962496860

Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/UTCR/2026_UTCR_ch12.pdf

UTCR 13.060 — PLEADINGS IN CASES SUBJECT OR NOT SUBJECT TO ARBITRATION

2026 Uniform Trial Court Rules — Chapter 13 · physical PDF page 2–3 · 2026

13.060 PLEADINGS IN CASES SUBJECT OR NOT SUBJECT TO ARBITRATION (1) All civil actions (including domestic relations cases described under ORS 36.405(1)(b)) will be assigned to arbitration unless one of the following occurs: (a) The title of a pleading contains the words “CLAIM NOT SUBJECT TO MANDATORY ARBITRATION” in compliance with subsection (3) of this rule. (b) Any party files a notice, prior to the assignment to arbitration, that the case is not subject to mandatory arbitration. The notice must state grounds sufficient to exempt the case from mandatory arbitration. (c) The court orders the case removed from mandatory arbitration under ORS 36.405(2). (2) Notice under part (1)(a) or (1)(b) of this rule does not prevent any party from asserting by appropriate motion, that the case is subject to mandatory arbitration. (3) A party must place one or the other of the following in the title of a pleading in the case (including a claim, counterclaim, cross claim, third-party claim, petitio…

Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt

Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.

Captured 2026-10-18T22:31:14.543022+00:00 · Published 2026 chapter effective 2026-08-01; apply with separately indexed amending Chief Justice Orders

Stored circuit-court rule excerpt. Read the complete rule, exceptions, current publisher version and actual case orders; applicability and deadlines are not established.

Source provenance

machine_extracted_unreviewed

SHA-256 f64e46a75bd44c26ca421b4d67ba5fd653cc0d479bab915f1cf3d020e4603657

Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/UTCR/2026_UTCR_ch13.pdf

UTCR 13.160 — SCHEDULING OF THE HEARING

2026 Uniform Trial Court Rules — Chapter 13 · physical PDF page 6 · 2026

13.160 SCHEDULING OF THE HEARING (1) The arbitrator shall set the time, date and place of hearing and shall give reasonable notice of the hearing date to the parties and comply with ORS 36.420. The arbitrator shall also give notice of the hearing date and any continuance to the trial court administrator. (2) A court may adopt a Supplementary Local Rule establishing a deadline for the arbitration hearing and a process for obtaining a postponement or continuance. A Supplementary Local Rule may not allow the arbitration process to extend more than six months from the date the case is assigned to an arbitrator. In the absence of a Supplementary Local Rule adopted pursuant to this section, the requirements set forth below in sections (3) and (4) shall apply. (3) Except for good cause shown, the hearing must be scheduled to take place not sooner than 14 days, or later than 49 days, from the date of assignment of the case to the arbitrator. The parties may stipulate to a postponement or conti…

Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt

Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.

Captured 2026-10-18T22:31:14.543022+00:00 · Published 2026 chapter effective 2026-08-01; apply with separately indexed amending Chief Justice Orders

Stored circuit-court rule excerpt. Read the complete rule, exceptions, current publisher version and actual case orders; applicability and deadlines are not established.

Source provenance

machine_extracted_unreviewed

SHA-256 f64e46a75bd44c26ca421b4d67ba5fd653cc0d479bab915f1cf3d020e4603657

Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/UTCR/2026_UTCR_ch13.pdf