Search a rule number or topic in circuit-court local rules and statewide UTCR. County filters select sources; they do not determine the court, venue or applicable law.
36 Oregon counties · 27 local rulebooks · 24 UTCR chapter PDFsMachine-extracted or machine-OCR source text, not independently validated legal requirements. Later amendments, case orders, exceptions, signatures, service, fees and deadlines require original-source review. Reserved and repealed chapters do not create requirements.
Reserved and repealed-only chapters are retained as such. Amendment and supplemental orders are searched separately because their extracted text may include deleted or superseded provisions. Some scans have machine OCR, visibly labeled and unreviewed. Remaining scans have original-source links only. Verify all text and amendment markings in the PDF.
Official local rules ↗ ·
Official current UTCR ↗
Search public rule numbers or topics. Leave out names, case numbers and private document text.
Stored source matches
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules — physical PDF page 96
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules · physical PDF page 96 · 2026
A-38 2. 3.170—ASSOCIATION OF OUT -OF-STATE COUNSEL (PRO HAC VICE) Amended out of cycle to increase the pro hac vice application fee. ACTION TAKEN Amendment of the rule was preliminarily recommended by consensus at the UTCR Committee’s fall meeting on October 24, 2025. The rule was then amended out of cycle by SCO 25-054, effective January 1, 2026. EXPLANATION This proposal was submitted by Myah Kehoe, President of OSB, on behalf of the OSB Board of Governors. It amends UTCR 3.170(6) to increase the pro hac vice application fee from $500 to $750 dollars, effective January 1, 2026. At the fall 2025 meeting, the proponent provided testimony explaining the need for the fee increase as follows. The pro hac vice application fee has not been increased since July 1, 2014, when it was raised to $500. Increasing the fee to $750 reflects inflationary increases and aligns the fee with the current administrative costs associated with processing pro hac vice applications. According to Consumer Price…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T22:31:09.969140+00:00 · Chief Justice amendment order effective 2026-08-01; original amendment document, not consolidated rule text Only approved-change pages1-25 and out-of-cycle amendment pages94-101 are indexed. Disapproved proposals, deferred recommendations and administrative actions on pages26-93 and102-105 remain source context only. This packet is not consolidated rule text; dates differ by provision.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 4d3584770d44af58f80c4ebf07da611b26a865195202c369dba2f465261fb0a5
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/UTCR/CJO_2026-021.pdf
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules — physical PDF page 101
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules · physical PDF page 101 · 2026
A-43 (c) A separate petition for waiver must be filed in each judicial district in which the person desires a waiver. (d) If the court grants a petition for waiver, the bar [member]{licensee} obtaining the waiver must (i) File a copy of the court’s order in each case subject to the waiver; and (ii) Include the words “Exempt from eFiling per Waiver Granted [DATE]” in the caption of all documents conventionally filed during the duration of the waiver. (e) If the court grants a motion for waiver, the bar [member]{licensee} obtaining the waiver must include the words “Exempt from eFiling per Waiver Granted [DATE]” in the caption of all documents conventionally filed in the case. (3) If the electronic filing system is continuously unavailable for a period of more than 24 hours, an active [member]{licensee} of the Oregon State Bar may file documents using conventional filing until the end of the first full business day after the day on which the electronic filing system becomes available. * …
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T22:31:09.969140+00:00 · Chief Justice amendment order effective 2026-08-01; original amendment document, not consolidated rule text Only approved-change pages1-25 and out-of-cycle amendment pages94-101 are indexed. Disapproved proposals, deferred recommendations and administrative actions on pages26-93 and102-105 remain source context only. This packet is not consolidated rule text; dates differ by provision.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 4d3584770d44af58f80c4ebf07da611b26a865195202c369dba2f465261fb0a5
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/UTCR/CJO_2026-021.pdf
PJO 24-007A Mandatory Training Non-Professional Fiduciaries — physical PDF page 2
PJO 24-007A Mandatory Training Non-Professional Fiduciaries · physical PDF page 2 ·
Presiding Judge Order 24-007 (Amendment 1) Page 2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 NOW THEREFORE IT IS SO ORDERED th at the Non-Professional Fiduciary Education and Training Program set out in the 6th Judicial District (Umatilla County and Morrow County) is as follows: 1) The following court appointed non-professional fiduciaries are subject to this rule: a) Any guardian or conservator appointed pursuant to ORS Chapter 125 on or after the effective date of this Presiding Judge Order. b) Any personal representative appointed pursuant to ORS Chapter 113 on or after the effective date of this Presiding Judge Order. c) Any trustee appointed pursuant to ORS Chapter 130 on or after the effective date of this Presiding Judge Order d) Any non-professional fiduciary cited fo r a deficiency in the handling of fiduciary duties pursuant to the show cause process. 2) All non-professional fiduciaries involved in a case described under subsection (1) above, sh…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T22:32:44.067349+00:00 · Publisher library classifies this order CURRENT on retrieval; operative status, amendments, rescissions and case applicability have not been independently legally reviewed. Publisher filename uses24-007A; the PDFcaption identifies24-007(Amendment1). The catalog keeps the actual order identity.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 75e1dee42f4df6ec3aa501617b5412227cb13a37bc6e5c196336c6ea041f87ae
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/Documents/UMA_PJO_24-007A_MandatoryTrainingNon-ProfessionalFiduciaries.pdf
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules — physical PDF page 100
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules · physical PDF page 100 · 2026
A-42 5. 21.140—MANDATORY ELECTRONIC FILING Changed references from “member” to “licensee.” See related items D.1 and D.3–D.4. ACTION TAKEN Amendment of the rule was preliminarily recommended by consensus at the UTCR Committee’s fall meeting on October 24, 2025. The rule was then amended out of cycle by CJO 25-051, effective January 1, 2026. No public comments were received. EXPLANATION See also the background explanation for related item D.1. The amendment to UTCR 21.140(1)–(3) changed “member” to “licensee” to conform to SB 166. The committee agreed by consensus to recommend approval of the amendment out of cycle to align with the effective date of SB 166. AMENDMENT 21.140 MANDATORY ELECTRONIC FILING (1) An active [member]{licensee} of the Oregon State Bar must file a document using the electronic filing system, instead of using conventional filing, unless: (a) The document is required to be conventionally filed under UTCR 21.070(3); or (b) The filer has obtained a waiver under subsec…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T22:31:09.969140+00:00 · Chief Justice amendment order effective 2026-08-01; original amendment document, not consolidated rule text Only approved-change pages1-25 and out-of-cycle amendment pages94-101 are indexed. Disapproved proposals, deferred recommendations and administrative actions on pages26-93 and102-105 remain source context only. This packet is not consolidated rule text; dates differ by provision.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 4d3584770d44af58f80c4ebf07da611b26a865195202c369dba2f465261fb0a5
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/UTCR/CJO_2026-021.pdf
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules — physical PDF page 8
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules · physical PDF page 8 · 2026
A-7 41. 26.160—PRIVILEGE AGAINST DISCLOSURE FOR COLLABORATIVE LAW COMMUNICATION; ADMISSIBILITY; DISCOVERY Adopt a new rule regarding the application of privilege in a collaborative law proceeding. See related items B.25–B.40 and B.42–B.44. 42. 26.170— WAIVER AND PRECLUSION OF PRIVILEGE Adopt a new rule regarding waiver and preclusion of waiver during a collaborative law proceeding. See related items B.25–B.41 and B.43–B.44. 43. 26.180—LIMITS OF PRIVILEGE Adopt a new rule regarding the limits of privilege for collaborative law communications. See related items B.25–B.42 and B.44. 44. 26.190—AUTHORITY OF TRIBUNAL IN CASE OF NONCOMPLIANCE Adopt a new rule regarding authority of a tribunal in cases of noncompliance. See related items B.25–B.43. C. DEFERRED RECOMMENDATIONS The UTCR Committee did not issue a recommendation with regard to the following related proposals to amend UTCR chapter 12—Mediation. See section IV.C for a detailed explanation. 1. 12.010—APPLICABILITY Modify the rule lan…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T22:31:09.969140+00:00 · Chief Justice amendment order effective 2026-08-01; original amendment document, not consolidated rule text Only approved-change pages1-25 and out-of-cycle amendment pages94-101 are indexed. Disapproved proposals, deferred recommendations and administrative actions on pages26-93 and102-105 remain source context only. This packet is not consolidated rule text; dates differ by provision.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 4d3584770d44af58f80c4ebf07da611b26a865195202c369dba2f465261fb0a5
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/UTCR/CJO_2026-021.pdf
PJO 24-006 Pretrial Release (Am1) — physical PDF page 7
PJO 24-006 Pretrial Release (Am1) · physical PDF page 7 ·
Presiding Judge Order 24-006 (Amendment 1) Page 7 of 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 degree invasion of privacy, and any attempt to commit luring a minor, purchasing sex with a minor, and first-degree invasion of privacy; (d) Any domestic violence felony or misdemeanor, as defined in ORS 135.230; (e) Any felony stalking as described in ORS 163.732, any violation of a stalking protective order as desc ribed in ORS 163.750, and felony strangulation as described in ORS 163.187; and (f) The following Class B felony-controlled substance offenses; (i) Manufacture of hydrocodone within 1,000 feet of a school, as defined in ORS 475.808; (ii) Delivery of hydrocodone within 1,000 feet of a school, as defined in ORS 475.812; (iii) Unlawful delivery of a Schedule III controlled substance to a minor, as defined in ORS 475.906(2); (iv) Causing another person to ingest a controlled substance, as defined in ORS 475.908(1); (v) Applying a Schedule III controlled …
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T22:32:44.067349+00:00 · Publisher library classifies this order CURRENT on retrieval; operative status, amendments, rescissions and case applicability have not been independently legally reviewed.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 626664247cf4a6f7d1c8c7392acd08d023ad512bd7988931a4bb9d41e491880e
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/Documents/UMA_PJO_24-006 (Am1)_PretrialRelease.pdf.pdf
PJO 24-006 Pretrial Release (Am1) — physical PDF page 12
PJO 24-006 Pretrial Release (Am1) · physical PDF page 12 ·
Attachment 1 to PJO 24‐006 STEP 1: AUTHORIZATION AND CRITERIA FOR PRETRIAL RELEASE Persons charged with the following offenses are to be released on recognizance, released on conditions, or held for arraignment subject to application of overriding circumstances described below. GUIDELINE RELEASE TYPE OFFENSE TYPE 1 Release on personal recognizance on a release agreement with the general conditions in ORS 135.250 Any non‐person misdemeanor, except those listed in Guideline 2 or 3; Any non‐person Class C felony, except those listed in Guideline 2 or 3; Any driving while suspended offense defined in ORS 811.182 except for aggravated driving while suspended as defined in ORS 163.196; and Any other offense that is not listed in Guideline 2 or 3 2 Release on conditions specified below as imposed by the court all defendants charged with Any non‐domestic violence person misdemeanor, as defined in OAR 213‐ 003‐0001(15); Any driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII) offense; …
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T22:32:44.067349+00:00 · Publisher library classifies this order CURRENT on retrieval; operative status, amendments, rescissions and case applicability have not been independently legally reviewed.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 626664247cf4a6f7d1c8c7392acd08d023ad512bd7988931a4bb9d41e491880e
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/Documents/UMA_PJO_24-006 (Am1)_PretrialRelease.pdf.pdf
PJO 24-006 Pretrial Release (Am1) — physical PDF page 16
PJO 24-006 Pretrial Release (Am1) · physical PDF page 16 ·
Attachment 1 to PJO 24‐006 C. SPECIAL CONDITIONS IN ADDITION TO GENERAL CONDITIONS AND ENHANCED CONDITIONS, THESE SPECIAL CONDITIONS ARE CHARGE AND CIRCUMSTANCE BASED REQUIRE FOR ANY RELEASE TO ANY RELEASE CHARGE SPECIAL CONDITION OF RELEASE FELONY; or Domestic Violence No Purchase or possession of firearms, Weapons or ammunition. DUII; NARCOTICS RELATED To not use or possess alcohol, marijuana, or controlled substances without a valid prescription, & comply any Alcohol Monitoring To not enter bars, taverns, liquor stores or other businesses whose primary business is selling alcohol or controlled substances Non‐DV person crimes eligible for release with special conditions No direct or indirect contact with the victim: NAME, APPROACH DISTANCE, ADDRESS, EMPLOYMENT No entry onto premises, business or other location occupied by the victim No possession or access to firearms or other deadly weapons If alcohol is implicated in the crime, absolutely no consumption of alcohol CRI…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T22:32:44.067349+00:00 · Publisher library classifies this order CURRENT on retrieval; operative status, amendments, rescissions and case applicability have not been independently legally reviewed.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 626664247cf4a6f7d1c8c7392acd08d023ad512bd7988931a4bb9d41e491880e
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/Documents/UMA_PJO_24-006 (Am1)_PretrialRelease.pdf.pdf