Search a rule number or topic in circuit-court local rules and statewide UTCR. County filters select sources; they do not determine the court, venue or applicable law.
36 Oregon counties · 27 local rulebooks · 24 UTCR chapter PDFsMachine-extracted or machine-OCR source text, not independently validated legal requirements. Later amendments, case orders, exceptions, signatures, service, fees and deadlines require original-source review. Reserved and repealed chapters do not create requirements.
Reserved and repealed-only chapters are retained as such. Amendment and supplemental orders are searched separately because their extracted text may include deleted or superseded provisions. Some scans have machine OCR, visibly labeled and unreviewed. Remaining scans have original-source links only. Verify all text and amendment markings in the PDF.
Official local rules ↗ ·
Official current UTCR ↗
Search public rule numbers or topics. Leave out names, case numbers and private document text.
Stored source matches
PJO 24-09 Adopting CJO 23-028 Permitting Remote Proceedings — physical PDF page 6
PJO 24-09 Adopting CJO 23-028 Permitting Remote Proceedings · physical PDF page 6 ·
Page 6 – PJO 24-09 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 • Protective Order applications, motions, and renewals (Family Abuse Prevention Act, Elderly Person and Persons with Disabilities Prevention Act, Sexual Abuse Protection Orders, Extreme Risk Protection Orders, and Stalking Orders) will be accepted at the accounting window each day: o Petitions filed by 11:00 a.m. shall be scheduled for an in-person hearing at 1:30 on the day of filing. o Petitions filed after 11:00 a.m. shall be scheduled for an in-person hearing at 1:30 the next judicial day. • Initial ex-parte hearings shall be conducted in-person unless the judge assigned to the case or presiding over the hearing allows a participant to appear by remote means. • Contested hearings shall be conducted in-person unless the judge assigned to the case or presiding over the hearing allows a participant to appear by remote means. In-custody parties shall appear by remote means. Court staff will ma…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T22:32:44.067349+00:00 · Publisher library classifies this order CURRENT on retrieval; operative status, amendments, rescissions and case applicability have not been independently legally reviewed.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 ae461aee0a41918ad62ae59adfc038710302e01dee0a8ff04bae93eb07ee4d53
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/Documents/24MARPJO24-09.pdf
PJO 24-09 Adopting CJO 23-028 Permitting Remote Proceedings — physical PDF page 1
PJO 24-09 Adopting CJO 23-028 Permitting Remote Proceedings · physical PDF page 1 ·
Page 1 – PJO 24-09 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF STATE OF OREGON FOR MARION COUNTY In the Matter of Marion County Circuit Court ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 24MARPJO No. 24-09 AMENDED PRESIDING JUDGE ORDER ADOPTING CJO 23-028 AND IMPLEMENTING UPDATED DIRECTIVES RELATING TO COURT OPERATIONS On August 30, 2023, Chief Justice Flynn issued Chief Justice Order 23-028 Permitting Remote Proceedings in Oregon state courts. ORS 1.171(2) provides that, to facilitate exercise of administration and supervision over the circuit court of the district consistent with applicable provisions of law, the Presiding Judge may apportion and otherwise regulate the disposition of the judicial business of the circuit court of the judicial district, and make rules, issue orders, and take other appropriate action to that exercise; and ORS 1.171(3) provides that the Presiding Judge may assign actions and proceedings pending before a court to other judges…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T22:32:44.067349+00:00 · Publisher library classifies this order CURRENT on retrieval; operative status, amendments, rescissions and case applicability have not been independently legally reviewed.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 ae461aee0a41918ad62ae59adfc038710302e01dee0a8ff04bae93eb07ee4d53
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/Documents/24MARPJO24-09.pdf
Court visitor order: Marion (09.22.2025).pdf — physical PDF page 2
Court visitor order: Marion (09.22.2025).pdf · physical PDF page 2 ·
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PRESIDING JUDGE ORDER b) Shadow a current Visitor on 1 occasion prior to being assigned a case of their own, after which a current Visitor shall shadow the new Visitor for 1 case and provide feedback to the court. c) Attend and observe 1 protective proceeding hearings at earliest convenience. d) Complete Language Line training. 3) Visitors shall utilize the following standards and procedures in the performance of their duties: a) Visitors shall interview the respondent/protected person in-person. b) Visitors shall conduct interviews of all persons deemed by the visitor to have relevant information. c) Visitors shall review all relevant records regarding the respondent, to the extent such records are available. d) Visitors shall comply with ORS 125.150. e) The Visitor’s report shall comply with ORS 125.155, using the form required by UTCR 9.400 and/or Supplemental Local Rule, if applicable. f) The Visitor shall b…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T23:01:50.110212+00:00 · Retained from official OJD county-specific court visitor library. Library dates are document labels, not verified effective dates; operative status and case applicability remain unreviewed.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 e2fc88e3e895ba53c32aaf98a19de53f2bfe501375964605e82fb83d2c826df2
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/programs/family/guardianship-conservatorship/Documents/Marion%20(09.22.2025).pdf
PJO 24-09 Adopting CJO 23-028 Permitting Remote Proceedings — physical PDF page 5
PJO 24-09 Adopting CJO 23-028 Permitting Remote Proceedings · physical PDF page 5 ·
Page 5 – PJO 24-09 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 i. JUVENILE: • Dependency proceedings shall be conducted in-person unless the judge assigned to the case or presiding over the hearing allows a participant to appear by remote means. • Termination of Parental Rights (TPR) proceedings shall be conducted in- person unless the judge assigned to the case or presiding over the hearing allows a participant to appear by remote means. • Delinquency proceedings shall be conducted in-person unless the judge assigned to the case or presiding over the hearing allows a participant to appear by remote means. • If you have further questions about Juvenile matters, please call 503-566- 2974. j. LANDLORD TENANT: • Forcible Entry and Detainer (FED) first appearances shall be conducted in- person unless the judge presiding over the hearing allows a participant to appear by remote means. An attorney may appear by remote means if they give notice to the court by 5…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T22:32:44.067349+00:00 · Publisher library classifies this order CURRENT on retrieval; operative status, amendments, rescissions and case applicability have not been independently legally reviewed.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 ae461aee0a41918ad62ae59adfc038710302e01dee0a8ff04bae93eb07ee4d53
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/Documents/24MARPJO24-09.pdf
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules — physical PDF page 19
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules · physical PDF page 19 · 2026
A-18 “b. [ ] I received objections that I could not resolve with a party despite reasonable efforts to do so. I have filed a copy of the objections I received and indicated which objections remain unresolved. “c. [ ] After conferring about objections, [role and name of objecting party] agreed to independently file any remaining objection. “4. [ ] Service is not required pursuant to subsection (3) of this rule, or by {the following }statute, rule, or otherwise{: }. “5. [ ] Each other party previously filed a waiver of appearance. “6. [ ] This is a proposed judgment that includes an award of punitive damages and notice has been served on the Director of the Crime Victims’ Assistance Section as required by subsection (5) of this rule. “7. [ ] Other: _______________________________________.” (3) The requirements of subsection (1) of this rule do not apply to: (a) A proposed order or judgment presented in open court with the parties present; (b) A proposed order or judgment for which servic…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T22:31:09.969140+00:00 · Chief Justice amendment order effective 2026-08-01; original amendment document, not consolidated rule text Only approved-change pages1-25 and out-of-cycle amendment pages94-101 are indexed. Disapproved proposals, deferred recommendations and administrative actions on pages26-93 and102-105 remain source context only. This packet is not consolidated rule text; dates differ by provision.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 4d3584770d44af58f80c4ebf07da611b26a865195202c369dba2f465261fb0a5
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/UTCR/CJO_2026-021.pdf