Court visitor order: Klamath (12.21.2023).pdf — physical PDF page 1
Court visitor order: Klamath (12.21.2023).pdf · physical PDF page 1 ·
IN THE CIRCIDT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FORTHECOUNTYOFKLAMATH In the Matter of: ) ) ) ) Presiding Judge Order No. 23-__ ESTABLISHING QUALIFICATIONS, STANDARDS and FEES for COURT VISITORS _____________ ) IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORS 125.165, which establishes minimum qualifications for persons serving as court visitors, the presiding judge must establish additional qualifications for court visitors appointed within that district as well as standards and procedures to be used by court visitors in the performance of their duties; AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORS 125.170, which sets forth requirements for payment and reimbursement for visitor services, the presiding judge must establish fees for court visitors conducting interviews, preparing reports, and otherwise engaged in the visitor's duties and responsibilities. IT IS NOW ORDERED that, in addition to the statutory qualifications, all court visitors appointed in the 13th Judicial District must meet at least one of the following qualifications…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T23:01:50.110212+00:00 · Retained from official OJD county-specific court visitor library. Library dates are document labels, not verified effective dates; operative status and case applicability remain unreviewed.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 8e55caf03521cda7979d3609700be9b1ac1cea56f2991feee8a0451194ee3844
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/programs/family/guardianship-conservatorship/Documents/Klamath%20(12.21.2023).pdf
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules — physical PDF page 19
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules · physical PDF page 19 · 2026
A-18 “b. [ ] I received objections that I could not resolve with a party despite reasonable efforts to do so. I have filed a copy of the objections I received and indicated which objections remain unresolved. “c. [ ] After conferring about objections, [role and name of objecting party] agreed to independently file any remaining objection. “4. [ ] Service is not required pursuant to subsection (3) of this rule, or by {the following }statute, rule, or otherwise{: }. “5. [ ] Each other party previously filed a waiver of appearance. “6. [ ] This is a proposed judgment that includes an award of punitive damages and notice has been served on the Director of the Crime Victims’ Assistance Section as required by subsection (5) of this rule. “7. [ ] Other: _______________________________________.” (3) The requirements of subsection (1) of this rule do not apply to: (a) A proposed order or judgment presented in open court with the parties present; (b) A proposed order or judgment for which servic…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T22:31:09.969140+00:00 · Chief Justice amendment order effective 2026-08-01; original amendment document, not consolidated rule text Only approved-change pages1-25 and out-of-cycle amendment pages94-101 are indexed. Disapproved proposals, deferred recommendations and administrative actions on pages26-93 and102-105 remain source context only. This packet is not consolidated rule text; dates differ by provision.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 4d3584770d44af58f80c4ebf07da611b26a865195202c369dba2f465261fb0a5
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/UTCR/CJO_2026-021.pdf