Court visitor order: Josephine (10.31.2019).pdf — physical PDF page 1
Court visitor order: Josephine (10.31.2019).pdf · physical PDF page 1 ·
FILED IV {31 I ftJOSEPHINE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT BY dJ-1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR JOSEPHINE COUNTY IN THE MATTER OF QUALIFICATIONS, STANDARDS, AND FEES FOR COURT VISITORS PRESIDING JUDGE ORDER 19-027 Pursuant to ORS 125.165 and 125.170(2) requires the Presiding Judge of each Judicial District to adopt Court Visitor qualifications for education, experience, standards, payment and reimbursement for Visitor services; therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: Visitors shall have the following qualifications: 1. Minimum Education • A bachelor's degree in Behavioral Science, Social Science or a closely related field, or • An associate degree in Behavioral Science, Social Science or a closely related field and two years of human services related experience; or • Replace education requirement with three years of human services related experience. 2. Relevant Experience • Training and/or experience in evaluating the functional capacity and needs of a protected person(s); and/or • E…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T23:01:50.110212+00:00 · Retained from official OJD county-specific court visitor library. Library dates are document labels, not verified effective dates; operative status and case applicability remain unreviewed.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 63a3b2166ba1a33653b342f289ffcc206f68731f24574b2e9318b1077fecb3d2
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/programs/family/guardianship-conservatorship/Documents/Josephine%20(10.31.2019).pdf
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules — physical PDF page 19
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules · physical PDF page 19 · 2026
A-18 “b. [ ] I received objections that I could not resolve with a party despite reasonable efforts to do so. I have filed a copy of the objections I received and indicated which objections remain unresolved. “c. [ ] After conferring about objections, [role and name of objecting party] agreed to independently file any remaining objection. “4. [ ] Service is not required pursuant to subsection (3) of this rule, or by {the following }statute, rule, or otherwise{: }. “5. [ ] Each other party previously filed a waiver of appearance. “6. [ ] This is a proposed judgment that includes an award of punitive damages and notice has been served on the Director of the Crime Victims’ Assistance Section as required by subsection (5) of this rule. “7. [ ] Other: _______________________________________.” (3) The requirements of subsection (1) of this rule do not apply to: (a) A proposed order or judgment presented in open court with the parties present; (b) A proposed order or judgment for which servic…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T22:31:09.969140+00:00 · Chief Justice amendment order effective 2026-08-01; original amendment document, not consolidated rule text Only approved-change pages1-25 and out-of-cycle amendment pages94-101 are indexed. Disapproved proposals, deferred recommendations and administrative actions on pages26-93 and102-105 remain source context only. This packet is not consolidated rule text; dates differ by provision.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 4d3584770d44af58f80c4ebf07da611b26a865195202c369dba2f465261fb0a5
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/UTCR/CJO_2026-021.pdf