Oregon court rules & publisher orders

Search a rule number or topic in circuit-court local rules and statewide UTCR. County filters select sources; they do not determine the court, venue or applicable law.

36 Oregon counties · 27 local rulebooks · 24 UTCR chapter PDFs

Machine-extracted or machine-OCR source text, not independently validated legal requirements. Later amendments, case orders, exceptions, signatures, service, fees and deadlines require original-source review. Reserved and repealed chapters do not create requirements.

Reserved and repealed-only chapters are retained as such. Amendment and supplemental orders are searched separately because their extracted text may include deleted or superseded provisions. Some scans have machine OCR, visibly labeled and unreviewed. Remaining scans have original-source links only. Verify all text and amendment markings in the PDF.

Official local rules ↗ · Official current UTCR ↗

2432 indexed entries · 167 publisher order documents · county orders in 30 counties

County coverage and remaining source gaps

All 36 counties have a mapped SLR rulebook. Supplemental orders remain incomplete. A zero below means no retained order in this collection; it does not mean that the court has no orders. OCR counts are machine-recognized documents, not legal review.

CountyNumbered SLR entriesCounty order PDFsOCR order PDFsSource-only order PDFs
Baker32320
Benton42110
Clackamas80833
Clatsop49100
Columbia18200
Coos3927913
Crook44101
Curry3926913
Deschutes3616213
Douglas56915
Gilliam22000
Grant132200
Harney132100
Hood River22000
Jackson621000
Jefferson44101
Josephine66100
Klamath55100
Lake37000
Lane68100
Lincoln64200
Linn30531
Malheur61110
Marion63310
Morrow89500
Multnomah210100
Polk401516
Sherman22000
Tillamook59210
Umatilla89400
Union65100
Wallowa65100
Wasco22000
Washington5825111
Wheeler22000
Yamhill52100

Search public rule numbers or topics. Leave out names, case numbers and private document text.

Browse rule topics

Stored source matches

SLR 9.081 — ORAL OBJECTIONS TO PROTECTIVE PROCEEDINGS

Grant, Harney County Supplementary Local Rules (2026) · physical PDF page 9–10 · 2026

9.081 ORAL OBJECTIONS TO PROTECTIVE PROCEEDINGS 1) Probate jurisdiction is in the County Courts of Grant and Harney Counties. This SLR only applies to cases that have been transferred to Grant or Harney County Circuit Court from the county courts. 2) Any interested person, as described in ORS 125.075(1), who has an oral objection to a petition in a protective proceeding should contact the Trial Court Administrator or designee in Grant County Circuit Court at (541) 575-1438 or in person at the Grant County Circuit Court window on the second floor of the courthouse located at 201 S. Humbolt, Canyon City, Oregon. In Harney County contact the Trial Court Administrator or designee at (541) 573-5207 or in person at the Harney County Page 10 of 14 – 24th Judicial District Supplemental Local Rules – effective February 1, 2026 Circuit Court window on the second floor of the courthouse located at 450 N. Buena Vista, Burns, Oregon. The objecting party should advise the Trial Court Administrator o…

Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt

Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.

Captured 2026-10-18T22:30:41.802948+00:00 · 2026 SLR publisher source, retrieved 2026-10-18; later amendments and case orders require separate verification

Stored circuit-court rule excerpt. Read the complete rule, exceptions, current publisher version and actual case orders; applicability and deadlines are not established.

Source provenance

machine_extracted_unreviewed

SHA-256 aab1669e80441c1a95686d0a3c6f8ffbf13af57afe778357eaf2dd4520c1b0eb

Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/Documents/Grant-Harney_SLR_2026.pdf

SLR 12.221 — MEDIATION WHERE POWER IMBALANCE EXISTS

Grant, Harney County Supplementary Local Rules (2026) · physical PDF page 13 · 2026

12.221 MEDIATION WHERE POWER IMBALANCE EXISTS 1) Where there is a restraining order between the parties, a history of domestic violence or abuse, an extreme imbalance in the power relationship between the parties or other reason to believe tha t m ediation may be inappropriate, a party may contact the assigned mediator to request that the parties meet with the mediator separately, the presence of a support person during mediation, telephonic mediation, or another remedy. A mediator may exclude a support person from a session if the support person disrupts the process of mediation. 2) The mediator may arrange separate sessions, require telephonic mediation, or terminate mediation at any time if the mediator believes that issues of violence, abuse, threatening behavior, manipulation, or power imbalance make further mediation inappropriate. In any telephonic mediation, both parties will participate by telephone. NOTE: the privacy of records and confidentiality of communications in mediati…

Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt

Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.

Captured 2026-10-18T22:30:41.802948+00:00 · 2026 SLR publisher source, retrieved 2026-10-18; later amendments and case orders require separate verification

Stored circuit-court rule excerpt. Read the complete rule, exceptions, current publisher version and actual case orders; applicability and deadlines are not established.

Source provenance

machine_extracted_unreviewed

SHA-256 aab1669e80441c1a95686d0a3c6f8ffbf13af57afe778357eaf2dd4520c1b0eb

Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/Documents/Grant-Harney_SLR_2026.pdf

SLR 7.101 — IN CAMERA REVIEW OF RECORDS

Grant, Harney County Supplementary Local Rules (2026) · physical PDF page 5–6 · 2026

7.101 IN CAMERA REVIEW OF RECORDS Unless otherwise ordered by the court, a motion for the in-camera review of records by the court shall be presented to the court as follows: Page 6 of 14 – 24th Judicial District Supplemental Local Rules – effective February 1, 2026 1) Parties seeking an in-camera review of documents shall file a motion supported by an affidavit which includes the following: a factual and legal summary of the case to enable the reviewing judge to understand the factual and legal issues in the case as related to the records request; a description of the information sought with as much specificity as possible; and the legal basis for the request. 2) Disclosure of records released will be limited to the attorneys, attorney staff and expert witnesses employed by the attorney. There will be a protective order, as set forth in these rules, issued in each case, prohibiting disclosure of the records or copying of the records, including copies to clients and all other persons w…

Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt

Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.

Captured 2026-10-18T22:30:41.802948+00:00 · 2026 SLR publisher source, retrieved 2026-10-18; later amendments and case orders require separate verification

Stored circuit-court rule excerpt. Read the complete rule, exceptions, current publisher version and actual case orders; applicability and deadlines are not established.

Source provenance

machine_extracted_unreviewed

SHA-256 aab1669e80441c1a95686d0a3c6f8ffbf13af57afe778357eaf2dd4520c1b0eb

Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/Documents/Grant-Harney_SLR_2026.pdf