Search a rule number or topic in circuit-court local rules and statewide UTCR. County filters select sources; they do not determine the court, venue or applicable law.
36 Oregon counties · 27 local rulebooks · 24 UTCR chapter PDFsMachine-extracted or machine-OCR source text, not independently validated legal requirements. Later amendments, case orders, exceptions, signatures, service, fees and deadlines require original-source review. Reserved and repealed chapters do not create requirements.
Reserved and repealed-only chapters are retained as such. Amendment and supplemental orders are searched separately because their extracted text may include deleted or superseded provisions. Some scans have machine OCR, visibly labeled and unreviewed. Remaining scans have original-source links only. Verify all text and amendment markings in the PDF.
Official local rules ↗ ·
Official current UTCR ↗
Search public rule numbers or topics. Leave out names, case numbers and private document text.
Stored source matches
25-007 Order to Set Aside Judgments and Seal Eligible Residential Landlord Tenant Cases — physical PDF page 2
25-007 Order to Set Aside Judgments and Seal Eligible Residential Landlord Tenant Cases · physical PDF page 2 ·
2 5. ORS 84.052 authorizes the use of electronic signatures. 6. Al lowing the State Court Administrator to conduct a review of circuit court records and determine and automate the setting aside of eligible judgments and sealing the official record in the cases using electronic data processing techniques will reduce judicial workload and assist the circuit court with administering the requirements in ORS 105.164 promptly and efficiently. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 1. The Office of the State Court Administrator may review circuit court records and determine and automate the setting aside of eligible judgments and sealing the official records in the cases using electronic data processing techniques and pursuant to the criteria in ORS 105.164 and House Bill 2001 (2023), Section 66, chapter 13, Oregon Laws 2023. 2. The Offi ce of the State Court Administrator may affix an electronic signature of the presiding judge on orders to set aside eligible judgments and seal the official record…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T22:32:44.067349+00:00 · Publisher library classifies this order CURRENT on retrieval; operative status, amendments, rescissions and case applicability have not been independently legally reviewed.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 6226edfc4c4c7257f6a1658afca7c8732cb2a8f0e8f4e03b92f24c0afc5889d2
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/Documents/DOU-PJO-25-007.pdf
25-007 Order to Set Aside Judgments and Seal Eligible Residential Landlord Tenant Cases — physical PDF page 1
25-007 Order to Set Aside Judgments and Seal Eligible Residential Landlord Tenant Cases · physical PDF page 1 ·
1 In the Matter of Sealing Records Pursuant to ORS 105.164 ) ) ) ) ) ) PRESIDING JUDGE ORDER File No. DOU-PJO-25-007 ORDER TO SET ASIDE JUDGMENTS AND SEAL ELIGIBLE RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD TENANT CASES I HEREBY FIND THAT: 1. OR S 1.002(10) establishes the presiding judge of each judicial district of this state are the adm inistrative heads of their respective courts and are responsible and accountable i n the exercise of their administrative authority and supervision over their respective c ourts. 2. When the C hief Justice of the Supreme Court permits the use of the electronic court r ecords, ORS 7.095 allows the State Court Administrator to prescribe standards governing the use of electronic data processing techniques by the Oregon Judicial Department, the preservation of the records so maintained, and controls to prevent unauthor ized access to records maintained using electronic data processing equipment. 3. O RS 105.164, amended by Oregon Laws 2025, chapter 256, section 21 (Senate Bil…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T22:32:44.067349+00:00 · Publisher library classifies this order CURRENT on retrieval; operative status, amendments, rescissions and case applicability have not been independently legally reviewed.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 6226edfc4c4c7257f6a1658afca7c8732cb2a8f0e8f4e03b92f24c0afc5889d2
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/Documents/DOU-PJO-25-007.pdf
25-006 Order Establishing Visitor Qualifications, Standard and Fees — physical PDF page 1
25-006 Order Establishing Visitor Qualifications, Standard and Fees · physical PDF page 1 ·
Presiding Judge Order # eon Oregon. .| _ ORDER ESTABLISHING VISITOR DOU-PJO-25-006 Douglas County | QUALIFICATIONS, STANDARDS AND [Rescinds Supersedes: CirouteCourt FEES All preniGun a ae related to ourt Visitors Douglas County Circuit Court (541) 957-2471 1036 SE Douglas Ave #JB201, Roseburg, OR 97470 dou.court@ojd.state.or.us This order supersedes General Order No. 16-04 and any other Presiding Judge Orders related to Court Visitors, Qualifications, Standards and Fees. Pursuant to ORS 125.165 and ORS 125.170, the presiding judge must establish the qualifications, standards and ORS 127.170 regarding fees for court visitors, NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: A court visitor shall meet the qualifications pursuant to ORS 125.165 and have the appropriate education, training and experience to conduct interviews and make recommendations as required of court visitors under the law and have knowledge of the law relating to visitors, their duties and responsibilities. Any interested per…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine OCR, unreviewed; recognition errors and lost amendment markings are possible. Verify the original PDF.
Captured 2026-10-18T22:32:44.067349+00:00 · Publisher library classifies this order CURRENT on retrieval; operative status, amendments, rescissions and case applicability have not been independently legally reviewed. Machine OCR generated 2026-10-18T22:59:06.138132+00:00 with tesseract v5.5.3.20260724; unreviewed recognition, layout and amendment-marking errors are possible. Source body effective date 2025-11-01; publisher metadata effective date 2025-11-01T07:00:00Z. Read the original date clause; no applicability conclusion is made. First-page header and publisher identify DOU-PJO-25-006, while both page footers say DOU-PJO-24-003. The unchanged source document contains this mismatch; OCR did not introduce it.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_ocr_unreviewed
SHA-256 2fa3885b2442f65edbfe9ead8cb066591bbed62dc47e2b7d67e76a8cde2b6d50
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/Documents/DOU-PJO-25-006.pdf
24-003 Adopting Schedule of Fines on Violations — physical PDF page 1
24-003 Adopting Schedule of Fines on Violations · physical PDF page 1 ·
State of Oregon Presiding Judge Order # 16 th Judicial District ADOPTING SCHEDULE OF FINES DOU-PJO-24-003 Douglas County ON VIOLATIONS Rescind s / Super sedes: Circuit Court DOU-PJO-18-003 Douglas County Circuit Court 1036 SE Douglas Ave #JB201, Roseburg , OR 97470 (541) 957-2471 dou.court@ojd.state.or.u s In the Matter of the adopting the schedule of fines on violations. A Violations Bureau exists within the Circuit Court of Douglas County, State of Oregon, pursuant to ORS 153.800 and ORS 153.806. In accordance with Chief Justice Order number 20-022; THIS COURT, having reviewed the current Schedule of Fines on Violations, has determined that the schedule should be revised. Now therefore , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Douglas County Circuit Court Violations Bureau Fine Schedu le shall be revised pursuant to Oregon Revised Statutes and local policy for offenses. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that if an out-of-state defendant requests a review of his/her driving record, then the Violati ons Cler…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T23:00:01.762234+00:00 · Retained from official publisher listing. Operative status, amendments, rescissions, and case applicability remain unreviewed. Only physical PDF page1 is indexed as the local PJO. Attached2021 fine tables and CJO20-022 on pages2-10 remain original-source context pending separate scope/currentness review.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 13255476d82ea5f22bb6dcb869e61d61ae3733faa8502e8ca433dc504e2f542e
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/Documents/DOU-PJO-24-003.pdf
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules — physical PDF page 24
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules · physical PDF page 24 · 2026
A-23 7. 18.040—FORM OF ORDER OR JUDGMENT Adopted a new rule regarding requirements for the form of a proposed order or judgment filed in an FED action. See related items A.4–A.6. ACTION TAKEN No motion was made to change the committee’s preliminary recommendation of approval. Accordingly, by committee convention, the October 24, 2025, preliminary recommendation became the committee’s final recommendation of approval. EXPLANATION See also the background explanation for related item A.4. The new rule imposes requirements for the form of a proposed order or judgment filed in an eviction action. At the fall 2025 meeting, the proponent provided the following testimony: • Whether an eviction action is subject to ORS chapter 90 is ultimately a legal determination. Plaintiffs sometimes mistakenly assert that an action is subject to ORS chapter 90 and defendants sometimes dispute the plaintiff’s assertion. It is important that the court determine whether an action is in fact subject to ORS chap…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T22:31:09.969140+00:00 · Chief Justice amendment order effective 2026-08-01; original amendment document, not consolidated rule text Only approved-change pages1-25 and out-of-cycle amendment pages94-101 are indexed. Disapproved proposals, deferred recommendations and administrative actions on pages26-93 and102-105 remain source context only. This packet is not consolidated rule text; dates differ by provision.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 4d3584770d44af58f80c4ebf07da611b26a865195202c369dba2f465261fb0a5
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/UTCR/CJO_2026-021.pdf
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules — physical PDF page 7
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules · physical PDF page 7 · 2026
A-6 32. 26.070—APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT BY TRIBUNAL Adopt a new rule regarding approval of agreements resulting from a collaborative law process. See related items B.25–B.31 and B.33–B.44. 33. 26.080—DISQUALIFICATION OF COLLABORATIVE LAWYER AND LAWYERS IN ASSOCIATED LAW FIRM Adopt a new rule regarding disqualification of a collaborative lawyer. See related items B.25–B.32 and B.34–B.44. 34. 26.090—LOW -INCOME PARTIES Adopt a new rule regarding representation of parties who are indigent. See related items B.25–B.33 and B.35–B.44. 35. 26.100—GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY AS PARTY Adopt a new rule regarding the representation of a party that is a government or governmental subdivision, agency, or instrumentality. See related items B.25–B.34 and B.36–B.44. 36. 26.110—DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION Adopt a new rule regarding the disclosure of information related to a collaborative matter during the collaborative law process. See related items B.25–B.35 and B.37–B.44. 37. 26.120—STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL REPO…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T22:31:09.969140+00:00 · Chief Justice amendment order effective 2026-08-01; original amendment document, not consolidated rule text Only approved-change pages1-25 and out-of-cycle amendment pages94-101 are indexed. Disapproved proposals, deferred recommendations and administrative actions on pages26-93 and102-105 remain source context only. This packet is not consolidated rule text; dates differ by provision.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 4d3584770d44af58f80c4ebf07da611b26a865195202c369dba2f465261fb0a5
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/UTCR/CJO_2026-021.pdf
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules — physical PDF page 21
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules · physical PDF page 21 · 2026
A-20 4. 18.010—DEFINITION Adopted a definition of “eviction action” for purposes of proposed new rules UTCR 18.020 to 18.040. See related items A.5–A.7. ACTION TAKEN No motion was made to change the committee’s preliminary recommendation of approval. Accordingly, by committee convention, the October 24, 2025, preliminary recommendation became the committee’s final recommendation of approval. EXPLANATION Background. These new rules, UTCR 18.010 to 18.040, were proposed by Danielle Ramos, Legal Policy Advisor for OJD’s Civil and Criminal Programs Division, to align court processes with Oregon law. Under ORS 105.164, OJD must annually set aside judgments and seal court records in forcible entry and detainer (FED) cases that meet statutory criteria. This law, effective in 2023, applies retroactively to judgments entered on or after January 1, 2014. Since 2023, OJD has worked to develop a centralized, automated process to identify eligible FED cases. Progress has been delayed because many F…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T22:31:09.969140+00:00 · Chief Justice amendment order effective 2026-08-01; original amendment document, not consolidated rule text Only approved-change pages1-25 and out-of-cycle amendment pages94-101 are indexed. Disapproved proposals, deferred recommendations and administrative actions on pages26-93 and102-105 remain source context only. This packet is not consolidated rule text; dates differ by provision.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 4d3584770d44af58f80c4ebf07da611b26a865195202c369dba2f465261fb0a5
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/UTCR/CJO_2026-021.pdf
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules — physical PDF page 12
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules · physical PDF page 12 · 2026
A-11 (2) Each page of the SLR must include a footer that shows the following: the page number, the revision date applicable to the set of SLR, the judicial district number, and the name of the court. {(3) SLR shall be numbered as follows: (a) SLR must be numbered as closely as possible to and in the same chapter as related UTCR. As an example, if a court adopted SLR to carry out the scheduling provisions of UTCR 7.010, an appropriate number would be SLR 7.011. (b) SLR numbers must fall between multiples of 10, for example, .015 or .021, not .010, to ensure they do not use numbers reserved for UTCR, which use only multiples of 10 for numbering. (c) Specific SLR numbers required by the UTCR must be used, for example, UTCR 1.160(2) (filing of documents); 3.180(11) (electronic recording and writing); 6.200(4) (pretrial settlement conferences); and 13.010 (arbitration proceedings.} ([3]{4}) A court that wishes to have a chapter dedicated to alternative dispute resolution (ADR) must use chap…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T22:31:09.969140+00:00 · Chief Justice amendment order effective 2026-08-01; original amendment document, not consolidated rule text Only approved-change pages1-25 and out-of-cycle amendment pages94-101 are indexed. Disapproved proposals, deferred recommendations and administrative actions on pages26-93 and102-105 remain source context only. This packet is not consolidated rule text; dates differ by provision.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 4d3584770d44af58f80c4ebf07da611b26a865195202c369dba2f465261fb0a5
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/UTCR/CJO_2026-021.pdf