Oregon court rules & publisher orders

CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules — physical PDF page 19

CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules · physical PDF page 19 · 2026

A-18 “b. [ ] I received objections that I could not resolve with a party despite reasonable efforts to do so. I have filed a copy of the objections I received and indicated which objections remain unresolved. “c. [ ] After conferring about objections, [role and name of objecting party] agreed to independently file any remaining objection. “4. [ ] Service is not required pursuant to subsection (3) of this rule, or by {the following }statute, rule, or otherwise{: }. “5. [ ] Each other party previously filed a waiver of appearance. “6. [ ] This is a proposed judgment that includes an award of punitive damages and notice has been served on the Director of the Crime Victims’ Assistance Section as required by subsection (5) of this rule. “7. [ ] Other: _______________________________________.” (3) The requirements of subsection (1) of this rule do not apply to: (a) A proposed order or judgment presented in open court with the parties present; (b) A proposed order or judgment for which servic…

Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt

Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.

Captured 2026-10-18T22:31:09.969140+00:00 · Chief Justice amendment order effective 2026-08-01; original amendment document, not consolidated rule text Only approved-change pages1-25 and out-of-cycle amendment pages94-101 are indexed. Disapproved proposals, deferred recommendations and administrative actions on pages26-93 and102-105 remain source context only. This packet is not consolidated rule text; dates differ by provision.

Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.

CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules — physical PDF page 18

CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules · physical PDF page 18 · 2026

A-17 At the spring meeting on April 29, 2026, the committee adopted by consensus a minor modification to streamline the amendment, which is reflected in the final approved version below. AMENDMENT 5.100 SUBMISSION OF PROPOSED ORDERS OR JUDGMENTS (1) Except as provided in subsection (3) of this rule, any proposed judgment or proposed order submitted to the court for signature must be: (a) Served on each attorney not less than three days prior to submission to the court, or (b) Accompanied by a stipulation by each attorney that no objection exists as to the judgment or order, or (c) Served on a self-represented party not less than seven days prior to submission to the court and be accompanied by notice of the time period to object. (2) Except as provided in subsection (4) of this rule, any proposed judgment or order submitted to the court must include, following the space for judicial signature, a dated and signed certificate that describes: (a) The manner and date of compliance with any…

Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt

Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.

Captured 2026-10-18T22:31:09.969140+00:00 · Chief Justice amendment order effective 2026-08-01; original amendment document, not consolidated rule text Only approved-change pages1-25 and out-of-cycle amendment pages94-101 are indexed. Disapproved proposals, deferred recommendations and administrative actions on pages26-93 and102-105 remain source context only. This packet is not consolidated rule text; dates differ by provision.

Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.

CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules — physical PDF page 3

CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules · physical PDF page 3 · 2026

A-2 2. 2.010—FORM OF DOCUMENTS Amended to remove the requirement to prepare pleadings, motions, and requested instructions with numbered lines. 3. 5.100—SUBMISSION OF PROPOSED ORDERS OR JUDGMENTS Amended to require parties to specify the rule or statutory basis upon which a submitted document is purported to be exempt from the advance service requirement imposed under the UTCR 5.100(1). 4. 18.010—DEFINITION Adopted a definition of “eviction action” for purposes of proposed new rules UTCR 18.020 to 18.040. See related items A.5–A.7. 5. 18.020—CAPTION Adopted a new rule regarding requirements for the caption of a complaint filed in a Forcible Entry and Detainer (FED) action. See related items A.4 and A.6–A.7. 6. 18.030—FORMAT OF COMPLAINT Adopted a new rule regarding requirements for the form of a complaint filed in an FED action. See related items A.4–A.5 and A.7. 7. 18.040—FORM OF ORDER OR JUDGMENT Adopted a new rule regarding requirements for the form of a proposed order or judgment f…

Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt

Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.

Captured 2026-10-18T22:31:09.969140+00:00 · Chief Justice amendment order effective 2026-08-01; original amendment document, not consolidated rule text Only approved-change pages1-25 and out-of-cycle amendment pages94-101 are indexed. Disapproved proposals, deferred recommendations and administrative actions on pages26-93 and102-105 remain source context only. This packet is not consolidated rule text; dates differ by provision.

Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.

CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules — physical PDF page 17

CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules · physical PDF page 17 · 2026

A-16 3. 5.100—SUBMISSION OF PROPOSED ORDERS OR JUDGMENTS Amended subsection (3) to require parties to specify the rule or statutory basis for claiming that a submitted document is exempt from the advance- service requirement in UTCR 5.100(1). ACTION TAKEN No motion was made to change the committee’s preliminary recommendation of approval. Accordingly, by committee convention, the October 24, 2025, preliminary recommendation became the committee’s final recommendation of approval. EXPLANATION This proposal, submitted by Judge Matthew A. Rowan of the Jackson County Circuit Court, amends UTCR 5.100(3)(b) to require parties to identify the specific rule or statute supporting a claim that a submitted document is exempt from the advance‑service requirement under 5.100(1). It also includes a conforming update to UTCR 5.100(2)(b). For background, UTCR 5.100 requires advance service on opposing parties of proposed orders and judgments (subsection (1)); requires a certification of compliance wit…

Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt

Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.

Captured 2026-10-18T22:31:09.969140+00:00 · Chief Justice amendment order effective 2026-08-01; original amendment document, not consolidated rule text Only approved-change pages1-25 and out-of-cycle amendment pages94-101 are indexed. Disapproved proposals, deferred recommendations and administrative actions on pages26-93 and102-105 remain source context only. This packet is not consolidated rule text; dates differ by provision.

Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.

CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules — physical PDF page 24

CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules · physical PDF page 24 · 2026

A-23 7. 18.040—FORM OF ORDER OR JUDGMENT Adopted a new rule regarding requirements for the form of a proposed order or judgment filed in an FED action. See related items A.4–A.6. ACTION TAKEN No motion was made to change the committee’s preliminary recommendation of approval. Accordingly, by committee convention, the October 24, 2025, preliminary recommendation became the committee’s final recommendation of approval. EXPLANATION See also the background explanation for related item A.4. The new rule imposes requirements for the form of a proposed order or judgment filed in an eviction action. At the fall 2025 meeting, the proponent provided the following testimony: • Whether an eviction action is subject to ORS chapter 90 is ultimately a legal determination. Plaintiffs sometimes mistakenly assert that an action is subject to ORS chapter 90 and defendants sometimes dispute the plaintiff’s assertion. It is important that the court determine whether an action is in fact subject to ORS chap…

Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt

Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.

Captured 2026-10-18T22:31:09.969140+00:00 · Chief Justice amendment order effective 2026-08-01; original amendment document, not consolidated rule text Only approved-change pages1-25 and out-of-cycle amendment pages94-101 are indexed. Disapproved proposals, deferred recommendations and administrative actions on pages26-93 and102-105 remain source context only. This packet is not consolidated rule text; dates differ by provision.

Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.

In the Matter of Request to Defer or Waive Fees or Court Costs and Entering Judgments If Fees and Court Costs are Deferred (Amended) — physical PDF page 2

In the Matter of Request to Defer or Waive Fees or Court Costs and Entering Judgments If Fees and Court Costs are Deferred (Amended) · physical PDF page 2 ·

e Order Regarding Deferral or Waiver of Fees. The clerk will fill out the form documenting the recommendation, complete the order portion of the form and then sign it. If the clerk has any questions about eligibility that do not fall within the guidelines outlined under Judicial Discretion, they shall consult with the TCA, DTCA, or a judge prior to completing the form. e Judgment. If fees are deferred the judgment form will be completed by the clerk and submitted to the TCA or DTCA. (In the absence of the TCA or DTCA the Judgment should be forwarded to a judge for signature.) Once the signed Judgment is returned to the clerk, the clerk will enter the Judgment and create a judgment lien. When paid in full, the clerk shall note that fact in the judgment lien record and change the judgment status to "satisfied". IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that these procedures do not apply to a request for waiver or deferral of fees and costs filed by an inmate subject to the provisions of ORS 30.642 to 30.650…

Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt

Machine OCR, unreviewed; recognition errors and lost amendment markings are possible. Verify the original PDF.

Captured 2026-10-18T23:00:01.762234+00:00 · Retained from official publisher listing. Operative status, amendments, rescissions, and case applicability remain unreviewed. First page expressly states this amended PJO 16-02 supersedes PJO 15-02. Machine OCR generated 2026-10-18T23:03:56.153396+00:00 with tesseract v5.5.3.20260724; unreviewed recognition errors and lost layout/markings remain. Verify the original.

Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.

CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules — physical PDF page 21

CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules · physical PDF page 21 · 2026

A-20 4. 18.010—DEFINITION Adopted a definition of “eviction action” for purposes of proposed new rules UTCR 18.020 to 18.040. See related items A.5–A.7. ACTION TAKEN No motion was made to change the committee’s preliminary recommendation of approval. Accordingly, by committee convention, the October 24, 2025, preliminary recommendation became the committee’s final recommendation of approval. EXPLANATION Background. These new rules, UTCR 18.010 to 18.040, were proposed by Danielle Ramos, Legal Policy Advisor for OJD’s Civil and Criminal Programs Division, to align court processes with Oregon law. Under ORS 105.164, OJD must annually set aside judgments and seal court records in forcible entry and detainer (FED) cases that meet statutory criteria. This law, effective in 2023, applies retroactively to judgments entered on or after January 1, 2014. Since 2023, OJD has worked to develop a centralized, automated process to identify eligible FED cases. Progress has been delayed because many F…

Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt

Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.

Captured 2026-10-18T22:31:09.969140+00:00 · Chief Justice amendment order effective 2026-08-01; original amendment document, not consolidated rule text Only approved-change pages1-25 and out-of-cycle amendment pages94-101 are indexed. Disapproved proposals, deferred recommendations and administrative actions on pages26-93 and102-105 remain source context only. This packet is not consolidated rule text; dates differ by provision.

Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.

PJO 21-05 (Amended): Exhibits for Hearings Under UTCR 6.050 and CJO 22-012 — physical PDF page 2

PJO 21-05 (Amended): Exhibits for Hearings Under UTCR 6.050 and CJO 22-012 · physical PDF page 2 ·

days after entry of judgment in juvenile cases. Exhibits will be destroyed 60 days after entry of judgment in cases other than juvenile cases, and 120 days after entry of judgment in juvenile cases. c. Non-documentary exhibits that are in electronic form, such as audio or video recordings, shall be submitted to the court on a CD, DVD or thumb drive at the clerk's window associated with the case by 5:00 PM at least two (2) court days prior to the date of the remote hearing or trial. A party may either provide the court with a self-addressed postage pre-paid envelope to return exhibits to the party or may pick up the exhibits not less than 30 days after entry of judgment in cases other than juvenile cases, and not less than 90 days after entry of judgment in juvenile cases. Exhibits will be destroyed 60 days after entry of judgment in cases other than juvenile cases, and 120 days after entry of judgment in juvenile case. i. Video must be submitted in either AVI, MP4 or WMA formatting. il…

Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt

Machine OCR, unreviewed; recognition errors and lost amendment markings are possible. Verify the original PDF.

Captured 2026-10-18T23:00:01.762234+00:00 · Retained from official publisher listing. Operative status, amendments, rescissions, and case applicability remain unreviewed. Machine OCR generated 2026-10-18T23:03:56.153396+00:00 with tesseract v5.5.3.20260724; unreviewed recognition errors and lost layout/markings remain. Verify the original. Source body effective date 2026-08-03; publisher metadata effective date None; verify the original date clause.

Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.

In The Matter of Satisfactions of Child Support Judgments ↗

Search this stored order

machine_extracted_unreviewed

Retained from official publisher listing. Operative status, amendments, rescissions, and case applicability remain unreviewed. Only physical PDF page1, amended General Order98-04, is indexed. Page2 is expressly vacated General Order93-02 and page3 an older98-04version; both remain unindexed original-source context.

In the Matter of Request to Defer or Waive Fees or Court Costs and Entering Judgments If Fees and Court Costs are Deferred (Amended) ↗

Search this stored order

machine_ocr_unreviewed

Retained from official publisher listing. Operative status, amendments, rescissions, and case applicability remain unreviewed. First page expressly states this amended PJO 16-02 supersedes PJO 15-02. Machine OCR generated 2026-10-18T23:03:56.153396+00:00 with tesseract v5.5.3.20260724; unreviewed recognition errors and lost layout/markings remain. Verify the original.

In the Matter of Signing Limited Judgments and Orders for the Application/Contribution Program established under ORS 151.487 (First Amended) ↗

Search this stored order

machine_ocr_unreviewed

Retained from official publisher listing. Operative status, amendments, rescissions, and case applicability remain unreviewed. Machine OCR generated 2026-10-18T23:03:56.153396+00:00 with tesseract v5.5.3.20260724; unreviewed recognition errors and lost layout/markings remain. Verify the original.