Oregon court rules & publisher orders

CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules — physical PDF page 9

CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules · physical PDF page 9 · 2026

A-8 6. 12.060—QUALIFICATION AS AN APPROVED GENERAL CIVIL MEDIATOR, ONGOING OBLIGATIONS Amend the basic training and ongoing obligations requirements for mediators. See related items C.1–C.5 and C.7–C.14. 7. 12.070—QUALIFICATION AS AN APPROVED DOMESTIC RELATIONS CUSTODY AND PARENTING MEDIATOR, ONGOING OBLIGATIONS Amend the training and ongoing obligations requirements for domestic relations custody and parenting mediators. See related items C.1–C.6 and C.8–C.14. 8. 12.080—QUALIFICATION AS AN APPROVED DOMESTIC RELATIONS FINANCIAL MEDIATOR, ONGOING OBLIGATIONS Amend the training and ongoing obligations requirements for domestic relations financial mediators. See related items C.1–C.7 and C.9–C.14. 9. 12.090—INDEPENDENT QUALIFICATION REVIEW Change the title and revise the rule to conform with proposed amendments to UTCR 12.030. See related items C.1–C.8 and C.10–C.14. 10. 12.100—BASIC MEDIATION CURRICULUM Amend the basic mediation training curriculum. See related items C.1–C.9 and C.11–C.1…

Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt

Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.

Captured 2026-10-18T22:31:09.969140+00:00 · Chief Justice amendment order effective 2026-08-01; original amendment document, not consolidated rule text Only approved-change pages1-25 and out-of-cycle amendment pages94-101 are indexed. Disapproved proposals, deferred recommendations and administrative actions on pages26-93 and102-105 remain source context only. This packet is not consolidated rule text; dates differ by provision.

Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.

In the Matter of Security Funds — physical PDF page 2

In the Matter of Security Funds · physical PDF page 2 ·

iii. If the defendant fails to appear and the security is ordered to be forfeited, the support enforcement agency shall within 60 days submit a motion and order to apply security to unpaid support judgment. iv. Remaining security posted shall be applied to a child support judgment and the court shall sign an order applying the remaining security deposit to the child support owed. c. If the security was deposited under ORS 135.265(3), the amount of the remaining security deposit applied to child support owed by the defendant shall not exceed 66% of the remaining amount of the security deposit; but in cases where the security was deposited under ORS 135.265(2), the full amount of security deposit remaining shall be applied to child support owed by the defendant. IV. After applying the security deposit to the aforementioned obligations, any amount that remains shall be returned to the person posting the security deposit. IT IS FURTHER OREDERED that General Order 95-04 and General Order 14…

Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt

Machine OCR, unreviewed; recognition errors and lost amendment markings are possible. Verify the original PDF.

Captured 2026-10-18T23:00:01.762234+00:00 · Retained from official publisher listing. Operative status, amendments, rescissions, and case applicability remain unreviewed. Machine OCR generated 2026-10-18T23:03:56.153396+00:00 with tesseract v5.5.3.20260724; unreviewed recognition errors and lost layout/markings remain. Verify the original.

Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.

In the Matter of Security Funds — physical PDF page 1

In the Matter of Security Funds · physical PDF page 1 ·

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT In the Matter of Security Funds General Order No. 24-01 This matter having come before the Court on its own motion; It appearing to the court that from time-to-time money is posted by persons arrested or other persons on behalf of persons arrested and released under a security release agreement; now, therefore: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: |. If a defendant appears at the date and time for arraignment and charges are not filed with the court, the money deposited with the court shall be applied pursuant to this order. ll. If no charges are filed, or if filed, dismissed before judgment, the security money deposited, after deduction for statutory assessment, shall be applied to other financial obligations owed to the court by the defendant. Ill. | After assessing the statutory assessment, and financial obligations imposed, if any, on charges filed as provided for in ORS 135.265(2), if money from the security deposit…

Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt

Machine OCR, unreviewed; recognition errors and lost amendment markings are possible. Verify the original PDF.

Captured 2026-10-18T23:00:01.762234+00:00 · Retained from official publisher listing. Operative status, amendments, rescissions, and case applicability remain unreviewed. Machine OCR generated 2026-10-18T23:03:56.153396+00:00 with tesseract v5.5.3.20260724; unreviewed recognition errors and lost layout/markings remain. Verify the original.

Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.

​In the Matter of Setting an Expedited Parenting Plan Enforcement Procedure — physical PDF page 1

​In the Matter of Setting an Expedited Parenting Plan Enforcement Procedure · physical PDF page 1 ·

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF cet Ee J FOR THE FIFTHTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICTS °° IN THE MATTER OF SETTING AN ) EXPEDITED PARENTING PLAN ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURE ORS 107.434 requires the presiding judge of a judicial district to enter an expedited parenting plan enforcement procedure; It is hereby ordered that upon filing of a motion for enforcement of a parenting time judgment under ORS 107.434, the clerk shall immediately deliver the motion, affidavit, and proposed order to a judge who shall direct the docketing clerk to set a hearing date within 45 days of the filing the motion after which the judge will sign the proposed order. Dated this 2nd day of September, 2014 at Coquille, Oregon. Richard L. Barron Presiding Judge

Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt

Machine OCR, unreviewed; recognition errors and lost amendment markings are possible. Verify the original PDF.

Captured 2026-10-18T23:00:01.762234+00:00 · Retained from official publisher listing. Operative status, amendments, rescissions, and case applicability remain unreviewed. Machine OCR generated 2026-10-18T23:03:56.153396+00:00 with tesseract v5.5.3.20260724; unreviewed recognition errors and lost layout/markings remain. Verify the original.

Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.

In The Matter of Satisfactions of Child Support Judgments — physical PDF page 1

In The Matter of Satisfactions of Child Support Judgments · physical PDF page 1 ·

a r: ?.i :.' : , IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON"' I**$ f**ij i pi* t: 5 I FOR THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT:':. .,,. i:, , .. .1....,,,,., il* ii iiil i r,'rii l ri i,;l, In the Matter of Satisfactions ) Amended General Order of Child Support Payments ) 98-04 ) ) This matter coming before the court on it's own motion; Whereas the Legislature has amended, gonsolidated and repealed certain statues relating to Judgments; and Whereas ORS 18.400 cited in General Order 98-04 has been repealed and renumbered. It IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT GENERAL ORDER 98.04 IS AMENDED TO\- READ: Pursuant to ORS 18.225 this court will file satisfactions of support payment judgments in cases where support payments are not ordered to be paid to the Department of Justice or where enforcement services are not provided pursuant to oRS. 25.080. It is so ordered this day z-?rt- of November,2006 *_--- 'F Richard L. Barron Presiding Judge

Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt

Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.

Captured 2026-10-18T23:00:01.762234+00:00 · Retained from official publisher listing. Operative status, amendments, rescissions, and case applicability remain unreviewed. Only physical PDF page1, amended General Order98-04, is indexed. Page2 is expressly vacated General Order93-02 and page3 an older98-04version; both remain unindexed original-source context.

Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.

CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules — physical PDF page 96

CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules · physical PDF page 96 · 2026

A-38 2. 3.170—ASSOCIATION OF OUT -OF-STATE COUNSEL (PRO HAC VICE) Amended out of cycle to increase the pro hac vice application fee. ACTION TAKEN Amendment of the rule was preliminarily recommended by consensus at the UTCR Committee’s fall meeting on October 24, 2025. The rule was then amended out of cycle by SCO 25-054, effective January 1, 2026. EXPLANATION This proposal was submitted by Myah Kehoe, President of OSB, on behalf of the OSB Board of Governors. It amends UTCR 3.170(6) to increase the pro hac vice application fee from $500 to $750 dollars, effective January 1, 2026. At the fall 2025 meeting, the proponent provided testimony explaining the need for the fee increase as follows. The pro hac vice application fee has not been increased since July 1, 2014, when it was raised to $500. Increasing the fee to $750 reflects inflationary increases and aligns the fee with the current administrative costs associated with processing pro hac vice applications. According to Consumer Price…

Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt

Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.

Captured 2026-10-18T22:31:09.969140+00:00 · Chief Justice amendment order effective 2026-08-01; original amendment document, not consolidated rule text Only approved-change pages1-25 and out-of-cycle amendment pages94-101 are indexed. Disapproved proposals, deferred recommendations and administrative actions on pages26-93 and102-105 remain source context only. This packet is not consolidated rule text; dates differ by provision.

Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.

In the Matter of Court Appearances, Alternate Locations and Finding Good Cause Regarding Appearances - Amended — physical PDF page 1

In the Matter of Court Appearances, Alternate Locations and Finding Good Cause Regarding Appearances - Amended · physical PDF page 1 ·

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT In the Matter of Court Appearances, Alternate ) Presiding Judge Order 23-03 ) Locations and Finding Good ) ) ) AMENDED FILED SEP 25 2023 Coos Co. Circuit Court THE ABOVE MATTER coming before the court on its own motion: Cause Regarding Appearances Pursuant to ORS 1.002(2) which provides that the Chief Justice may delegate the exercise of any powers specified in ORS 1.002 to the Presiding Judge of each Judicial District and Sections 6(4) and 6(5) of Oregon Laws 2020, Chapter 12, which provide that the Chief Justice may delegate certain additional powers to a Presiding Judge of a Judicial District; now, therefore: Pursuant to the authority authorized, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Except as set forth below, all court proceedings and appearances shall be held in-person in Coos and Curry Counties. 2. Remote appearances are permitted under the following circumstances: a. In-custody initial appearances in criminal ca…

Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt

Machine OCR, unreviewed; recognition errors and lost amendment markings are possible. Verify the original PDF.

Captured 2026-10-18T23:00:01.762234+00:00 · Retained from official publisher listing. Operative status, amendments, rescissions, and case applicability remain unreviewed. Machine OCR generated 2026-10-18T23:03:56.153396+00:00 with tesseract v5.5.3.20260724; unreviewed recognition errors and lost layout/markings remain. Verify the original.

Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.

In The Matter of Discovery of Department of Human Services Child Welfare Services Files, dated 7-15-09 — physical PDF page 1

In The Matter of Discovery of Department of Human Services Child Welfare Services Files, dated 7-15-09 · physical PDF page 1 ·

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT FiLg* Amended tB$ "m l5 ill l$ t3.---'N THE MATTER OF DISCOVERY OF DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES CHILD WELFARE SERVICES FILES ) ) ) ) o""?;l 8;f; ' Et*$*rrff ti fg#$' This matter having come before the court on its own motion to expedite the discovery of Department of Human Services Child Welfare Services (DHS) files by attorneys for children, parents, defendants and the state in juvenile and criminal cases involving the alleged abuse of a child and the court recognizing that the files are confidential under ORS 419A.255 and 4198.035 and not in the custody of the District Attorney's Office for Coos or Curry County, but the state has a duty to disclose under ORS 135.805 to 135.873 and 4198.881 and the Constitutions of Oregon and the United States and attorneys for children, parents, defendants, and the state need access to the files in an expeditious manner; It is hereby ordered that DHS make its files avail…

Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt

Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.

Captured 2026-10-18T23:00:01.762234+00:00 · Retained from official publisher listing. Operative status, amendments, rescissions, and case applicability remain unreviewed.

Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.

In The Matter of Satisfactions of Child Support Judgments ↗

Search this stored order

machine_extracted_unreviewed

Retained from official publisher listing. Operative status, amendments, rescissions, and case applicability remain unreviewed. Only physical PDF page1, amended General Order98-04, is indexed. Page2 is expressly vacated General Order93-02 and page3 an older98-04version; both remain unindexed original-source context.

​In the Matter of Setting an Expedited Parenting Plan Enforcement Procedure ↗

Search this stored order

machine_ocr_unreviewed

Retained from official publisher listing. Operative status, amendments, rescissions, and case applicability remain unreviewed. Machine OCR generated 2026-10-18T23:03:56.153396+00:00 with tesseract v5.5.3.20260724; unreviewed recognition errors and lost layout/markings remain. Verify the original.