Search a rule number or topic in circuit-court local rules and statewide UTCR. County filters select sources; they do not determine the court, venue or applicable law.
36 Oregon counties · 27 local rulebooks · 24 UTCR chapter PDFsMachine-extracted or machine-OCR source text, not independently validated legal requirements. Later amendments, case orders, exceptions, signatures, service, fees and deadlines require original-source review. Reserved and repealed chapters do not create requirements.
Reserved and repealed-only chapters are retained as such. Amendment and supplemental orders are searched separately because their extracted text may include deleted or superseded provisions. Some scans have machine OCR, visibly labeled and unreviewed. Remaining scans have original-source links only. Verify all text and amendment markings in the PDF.
Official local rules ↗ ·
Official current UTCR ↗
Search public rule numbers or topics. Leave out names, case numbers and private document text.
Stored source matches
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules — physical PDF page 4
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules · physical PDF page 4 · 2026
A-3 6. 25.030—ASSIGNMENT OF SPECIFIC JUDGE FOR RECEIVERSHIP; PRESUMPTION OF COMPLEX CASE Adopt a new rule regarding assignment of a receivership case to a specific judge and designation as a complex case. See related items B.3–B.5 and B.7–B.24. 7. 25.040—INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Adopt a new rule to require and govern initial case management conferences following appointment of a receiver. See related items B.3– B.6 and B.8–B.24. 8. 25.050—STATUS CONFERENCE Adopt a new rule regarding requests to schedule a status conference following appointment of a receiver. See related items B.3–B.7 and B.9– B.24. 9. 25.060—ALLOWED CLAIMS Adopt a new rule regarding allowed claims by creditors. See related items B.3–B.8 and B.10–B.24. 10. 25.070—INTERIM DISTRIBUTION Adopt a new rule regarding the allowance of interim distributions to creditors prior to the conclusion of a receivership case. See related items B.3–B.9 and B.11–B.24. 11. 25.080—BRIDGE OVER Adopt a new rule regarding automatic e…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T22:31:09.969140+00:00 · Chief Justice amendment order effective 2026-08-01; original amendment document, not consolidated rule text Only approved-change pages1-25 and out-of-cycle amendment pages94-101 are indexed. Disapproved proposals, deferred recommendations and administrative actions on pages26-93 and102-105 remain source context only. This packet is not consolidated rule text; dates differ by provision.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 4d3584770d44af58f80c4ebf07da611b26a865195202c369dba2f465261fb0a5
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/UTCR/CJO_2026-021.pdf
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules — physical PDF page 12
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules · physical PDF page 12 · 2026
A-11 (2) Each page of the SLR must include a footer that shows the following: the page number, the revision date applicable to the set of SLR, the judicial district number, and the name of the court. {(3) SLR shall be numbered as follows: (a) SLR must be numbered as closely as possible to and in the same chapter as related UTCR. As an example, if a court adopted SLR to carry out the scheduling provisions of UTCR 7.010, an appropriate number would be SLR 7.011. (b) SLR numbers must fall between multiples of 10, for example, .015 or .021, not .010, to ensure they do not use numbers reserved for UTCR, which use only multiples of 10 for numbering. (c) Specific SLR numbers required by the UTCR must be used, for example, UTCR 1.160(2) (filing of documents); 3.180(11) (electronic recording and writing); 6.200(4) (pretrial settlement conferences); and 13.010 (arbitration proceedings.} ([3]{4}) A court that wishes to have a chapter dedicated to alternative dispute resolution (ADR) must use chap…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T22:31:09.969140+00:00 · Chief Justice amendment order effective 2026-08-01; original amendment document, not consolidated rule text Only approved-change pages1-25 and out-of-cycle amendment pages94-101 are indexed. Disapproved proposals, deferred recommendations and administrative actions on pages26-93 and102-105 remain source context only. This packet is not consolidated rule text; dates differ by provision.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 4d3584770d44af58f80c4ebf07da611b26a865195202c369dba2f465261fb0a5
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/UTCR/CJO_2026-021.pdf
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules — physical PDF page 17
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules · physical PDF page 17 · 2026
A-16 3. 5.100—SUBMISSION OF PROPOSED ORDERS OR JUDGMENTS Amended subsection (3) to require parties to specify the rule or statutory basis for claiming that a submitted document is exempt from the advance- service requirement in UTCR 5.100(1). ACTION TAKEN No motion was made to change the committee’s preliminary recommendation of approval. Accordingly, by committee convention, the October 24, 2025, preliminary recommendation became the committee’s final recommendation of approval. EXPLANATION This proposal, submitted by Judge Matthew A. Rowan of the Jackson County Circuit Court, amends UTCR 5.100(3)(b) to require parties to identify the specific rule or statute supporting a claim that a submitted document is exempt from the advance‑service requirement under 5.100(1). It also includes a conforming update to UTCR 5.100(2)(b). For background, UTCR 5.100 requires advance service on opposing parties of proposed orders and judgments (subsection (1)); requires a certification of compliance wit…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T22:31:09.969140+00:00 · Chief Justice amendment order effective 2026-08-01; original amendment document, not consolidated rule text Only approved-change pages1-25 and out-of-cycle amendment pages94-101 are indexed. Disapproved proposals, deferred recommendations and administrative actions on pages26-93 and102-105 remain source context only. This packet is not consolidated rule text; dates differ by provision.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 4d3584770d44af58f80c4ebf07da611b26a865195202c369dba2f465261fb0a5
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/UTCR/CJO_2026-021.pdf
In the Matter of Court Appearances, Alternate Locations and Finding Good Cause Regarding Appearances - Amended — physical PDF page 2
In the Matter of Court Appearances, Alternate Locations and Finding Good Cause Regarding Appearances - Amended · physical PDF page 2 ·
moving party the hearing will be held in-person. d. Civil commitment hearings may be conducted remotely unless required to be held in-person. e. Family Treatment Court may be conducted in-person or by remote means. f. Mental Health Court may be conducted in-person or by remote means. 3. Upon a showing of good cause, an assigned judge may grant a motion by a party, attorney, or witness to appear by remote means in proceedings and appearances that are conducted in-person. Compliance with ORS 45.400 is required. 4. Oral argument, if request in the pleadings, on civil motions under ORCP 21, ORCP 23, ORCP 36-49, case management motions under UTCR Chapter 7, and criminal motions that do not require testimony shall be conducted by remote/telecommunicate means. The party that requests oral argument must arrange and initiate the remote/telecommunication unless the court directs otherwise. 5. The Fifteenth Judicial District conducts trials at the courthouses in Coquille and Gold Beach. In the ev…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine OCR, unreviewed; recognition errors and lost amendment markings are possible. Verify the original PDF.
Captured 2026-10-18T23:00:01.762234+00:00 · Retained from official publisher listing. Operative status, amendments, rescissions, and case applicability remain unreviewed. Machine OCR generated 2026-10-18T23:03:56.153396+00:00 with tesseract v5.5.3.20260724; unreviewed recognition errors and lost layout/markings remain. Verify the original.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_ocr_unreviewed
SHA-256 909cec9de0dcca6cdf3a228432fc3aa074bdf03708f597b7a61bbfbbd6bb301a
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/courts/coos/resources/GeneralOrders/23-03 - In the Matter of Court Appearances, Alternate Locations and Finding Good Cause Regarding Appearances - Amended.pdf
In the Matter of Request to Defer or Waive Fees or Court Costs and Entering Judgments If Fees and Court Costs are Deferred (Amended) — physical PDF page 2
In the Matter of Request to Defer or Waive Fees or Court Costs and Entering Judgments If Fees and Court Costs are Deferred (Amended) · physical PDF page 2 ·
e Order Regarding Deferral or Waiver of Fees. The clerk will fill out the form documenting the recommendation, complete the order portion of the form and then sign it. If the clerk has any questions about eligibility that do not fall within the guidelines outlined under Judicial Discretion, they shall consult with the TCA, DTCA, or a judge prior to completing the form. e Judgment. If fees are deferred the judgment form will be completed by the clerk and submitted to the TCA or DTCA. (In the absence of the TCA or DTCA the Judgment should be forwarded to a judge for signature.) Once the signed Judgment is returned to the clerk, the clerk will enter the Judgment and create a judgment lien. When paid in full, the clerk shall note that fact in the judgment lien record and change the judgment status to "satisfied". IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that these procedures do not apply to a request for waiver or deferral of fees and costs filed by an inmate subject to the provisions of ORS 30.642 to 30.650…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine OCR, unreviewed; recognition errors and lost amendment markings are possible. Verify the original PDF.
Captured 2026-10-18T23:00:01.762234+00:00 · Retained from official publisher listing. Operative status, amendments, rescissions, and case applicability remain unreviewed. First page expressly states this amended PJO 16-02 supersedes PJO 15-02. Machine OCR generated 2026-10-18T23:03:56.153396+00:00 with tesseract v5.5.3.20260724; unreviewed recognition errors and lost layout/markings remain. Verify the original.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_ocr_unreviewed
SHA-256 73001799ffb8a3848b0089f105c2c2d4959c9062b99f1d60d8a30dc701f5f69f
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/courts/coos/resources/GeneralOrders/PJO 2016-02 Fee Deferral WaiverCivil Action-Amended.pdf
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules — physical PDF page 6
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules · physical PDF page 6 · 2026
A-5 23. 25.200—TAKING TESTIMONY IN A CONTESTED MATTER ON A DISPUTED FACTUAL ISSUE Adopt a new rule requiring that a witness’s testimony on a disputed material factual issue must be taken in the same manner as in an adjunct action. See related items B.3–B.22 and B.24. 24. 25.210—OREGON RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE (ORCP APPLY TO CONTESTED MATTERS Adopt a new rule indicating that ORCP apply in contested matters unless a rule or court order provides otherwise. See related items B.3–B.23. 25. NEW CHAPTER 26— COLLABORATIVE LAW (ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION) Adopt the following 19 proposed new rules under a new UTCR chapter 26 to incorporate the Uniform Collaborative Law Rules (UCLR), into the UTCR. See related items B.26–B.44. 26. 26.010—DEFINITIONS Adopt UCLR definitions for the purposes of UTCR chapter 26. See related items B.25 and B.27–B.44. 27. 26.020—APPLICABILITY Adopt a new rule regarding applicability of the UCLR. See related items B.25–B.26 and B.28–B.44. 28. 26.030—COLLABORATIVE LA…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T22:31:09.969140+00:00 · Chief Justice amendment order effective 2026-08-01; original amendment document, not consolidated rule text Only approved-change pages1-25 and out-of-cycle amendment pages94-101 are indexed. Disapproved proposals, deferred recommendations and administrative actions on pages26-93 and102-105 remain source context only. This packet is not consolidated rule text; dates differ by provision.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 4d3584770d44af58f80c4ebf07da611b26a865195202c369dba2f465261fb0a5
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/UTCR/CJO_2026-021.pdf
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules — physical PDF page 22
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules · physical PDF page 22 · 2026
A-21 5. 18.020—CAPTION Adopted a new rule regarding requirements for the caption of a complaint filed in a Forcible Entry and Detainer (FED) action. See related items A.4 and A.6–A.7. ACTION TAKEN No motion was made to change the committee’s preliminary recommendation of approval. Accordingly, by committee convention, the October 24, 2025, preliminary recommendation became the committee’s final recommendation of approval. EXPLANATION See also the background explanation for related item A.4. The new rule requires that the caption of a complaint filed in an “eviction action” must include the words “Subject to Residential and Landlord Tenant Act.” It permits court staff to quickly identify the case type and enter it into OJD’s case management system. No public comments were received. NEW RULE 18.020 CAPTION In the caption of a complaint filed in an eviction action, the plaintiff must indicate if the case is subject to ORS chapter 90 in substantially the following form: “[ ] Subject to the…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T22:31:09.969140+00:00 · Chief Justice amendment order effective 2026-08-01; original amendment document, not consolidated rule text Only approved-change pages1-25 and out-of-cycle amendment pages94-101 are indexed. Disapproved proposals, deferred recommendations and administrative actions on pages26-93 and102-105 remain source context only. This packet is not consolidated rule text; dates differ by provision.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 4d3584770d44af58f80c4ebf07da611b26a865195202c369dba2f465261fb0a5
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/UTCR/CJO_2026-021.pdf