Search a rule number or topic in circuit-court local rules and statewide UTCR. County filters select sources; they do not determine the court, venue or applicable law.
36 Oregon counties · 27 local rulebooks · 24 UTCR chapter PDFsMachine-extracted or machine-OCR source text, not independently validated legal requirements. Later amendments, case orders, exceptions, signatures, service, fees and deadlines require original-source review. Reserved and repealed chapters do not create requirements.
Reserved and repealed-only chapters are retained as such. Amendment and supplemental orders are searched separately because their extracted text may include deleted or superseded provisions. Some scans have machine OCR, visibly labeled and unreviewed. Remaining scans have original-source links only. Verify all text and amendment markings in the PDF.
Official local rules ↗ ·
Official current UTCR ↗
Search public rule numbers or topics. Leave out names, case numbers and private document text.
Stored source matches
In the Matter of Request to Defer or Waive Fees or Court Costs and Entering Judgments If Fees and Court Costs are Deferred (Amended) — physical PDF page 1
In the Matter of Request to Defer or Waive Fees or Court Costs and Entering Judgments If Fees and Court Costs are Deferred (Amended) · physical PDF page 1 ·
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT In the Matter of Requests to Defer or Waive Fees or ) Presiding Judge Order 16-02 ) Court Costs and Entering ) ) ) (Amended) Judgments If Fees and Court Costs are Deferred Supersedes PJO 15-02 FILED AUG 9 3 2026 THE ABOVE MATTER coming before the court on its own motion: a nal Whereas ORS 21.682(1) allows a judge to waive or defer all or part of fees and costs payable to the court by a party in a civil action or proceeding, if the judge finds that the party is unable to pay all or any part of the fees and costs. Whereas ORS 21.682(2) allows a presiding judge to delegate the authority to waive or defer fees and court costs to the court administrator if the delegation is made in writing and provides clear standards. Whereas Chief Justice Order 18-024, pursuant to ORS 21.682, establishes standards and practices for fee waivers and deferrals, effective November 9, 2012. IT IS THEREBY ORDERED that, effective No…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine OCR, unreviewed; recognition errors and lost amendment markings are possible. Verify the original PDF.
Captured 2026-10-18T23:00:01.762234+00:00 · Retained from official publisher listing. Operative status, amendments, rescissions, and case applicability remain unreviewed. First page expressly states this amended PJO 16-02 supersedes PJO 15-02. Machine OCR generated 2026-10-18T23:03:56.153396+00:00 with tesseract v5.5.3.20260724; unreviewed recognition errors and lost layout/markings remain. Verify the original.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_ocr_unreviewed
SHA-256 73001799ffb8a3848b0089f105c2c2d4959c9062b99f1d60d8a30dc701f5f69f
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/courts/coos/resources/GeneralOrders/PJO 2016-02 Fee Deferral WaiverCivil Action-Amended.pdf
In the Matter of Local Payment Plans and Authorizing Waiver or Suspension of Fees — physical PDF page 1
In the Matter of Local Payment Plans and Authorizing Waiver or Suspension of Fees · physical PDF page 1 ·
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT In the Matter of ) Presiding Judge Order 21-01 Local Payment Plans and ) AMENDED Authorizing Waiver or ) FILED Suspension of Fees ) OCT 04 202 THE ABOVE MATTER coming before the court on its own motion: Coos Co. Circuit Court Pursuant to ORS 1.002, ORS 1.202 and Chief Justice Order 21-043 the Court finds there is good cause to establish a local process to handle payment plans, payment schedule assessment fees and outstanding debt as the result of payment schedule assessment fees. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. On any new case established in Coos or Curry Circuit Court where there is a debt owed, parties will be given 365 days from the date that debt is imposed to pay the full amount. 2. Any party who owes such a debt who is sentenced to the Oregon Department of Correction will be required to pay such a debt within 365 days after the date of release from the Department of Corrections. 3. The court will not enter …
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine OCR, unreviewed; recognition errors and lost amendment markings are possible. Verify the original PDF.
Captured 2026-10-18T23:00:01.762234+00:00 · Retained from official publisher listing. Operative status, amendments, rescissions, and case applicability remain unreviewed. Amended PJO 21-01 retained; unamended central-library copy excluded. Machine OCR generated 2026-10-18T23:03:56.153396+00:00 with tesseract v5.5.3.20260724; unreviewed recognition errors and lost layout/markings remain. Verify the original. Only physical PDF page 1 is the local amended PJO 21-01. Pages 2-3 are attached statewide CJO 21-043 and are retained as source context only, excluded from county rule text indexing pending separate scope and currentness review.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_ocr_unreviewed
SHA-256 9063bdfc21ef2fa34d5f54ae47648a555f0a18700ac40f2e6db5c42d149d4ba9
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/courts/coos/resources/GeneralOrders/21-01 - Amended - In the Matter of Local Payment Plans and Authorizing Waiver or Suspension of Fees.pdf
General Order 18-03 (Third Amended): Court Visitor Qualifications, Standards and Fees — physical PDF page 1
General Order 18-03 (Third Amended): Court Visitor Qualifications, Standards and Fees · physical PDF page 1 ·
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT FILED In the Matter of Establishing, General Order Qualifications, Standards and Fees for Court Visitors 18-03 Coos Co (Third Amended) Circuit Court This order amends General Order 18-03 (Second Amended). Pursuant to ORS 125.165 and ORS 125.170 the presiding judge must establish the qualifications, standards and fees for court visitors; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: A court visitor shall meet the qualifications pursuant to ORS 125.165 and have the appropriate education, training and experience to conduct interviews and make recommendations as required of court visitors under the law and have knowledge of the law relating to visitors, their duties and responsibilities. Any interested person who wishes to become a visitor shall submit a cover letter and resume’ to the Trial Court Administrator. It is further ordered that the judge in the Fifteenth Judicial District assigned to probate cases may interview any person …
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine OCR, unreviewed; recognition errors and lost amendment markings are possible. Verify the original PDF.
Captured 2026-10-18T23:00:01.762234+00:00 · Retained from official publisher listing. Operative status, amendments, rescissions, and case applicability remain unreviewed. Machine OCR generated 2026-10-18T23:03:56.153396+00:00 with tesseract v5.5.3.20260724; unreviewed recognition errors and lost layout/markings remain. Verify the original.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_ocr_unreviewed
SHA-256 eae968cb6baccac4bcd38c5244c0011fbdedfcd0943dcd9b469ca629b7b54206
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/courts/coos/resources/GeneralOrders/18-03 - Third Amended - Qualifications, Standards and Fees for Court Visitors.pdf
In the Matter of Request to Defer or Waive Fees or Court Costs and Entering Judgments If Fees and Court Costs are Deferred (Amended) — physical PDF page 2
In the Matter of Request to Defer or Waive Fees or Court Costs and Entering Judgments If Fees and Court Costs are Deferred (Amended) · physical PDF page 2 ·
e Order Regarding Deferral or Waiver of Fees. The clerk will fill out the form documenting the recommendation, complete the order portion of the form and then sign it. If the clerk has any questions about eligibility that do not fall within the guidelines outlined under Judicial Discretion, they shall consult with the TCA, DTCA, or a judge prior to completing the form. e Judgment. If fees are deferred the judgment form will be completed by the clerk and submitted to the TCA or DTCA. (In the absence of the TCA or DTCA the Judgment should be forwarded to a judge for signature.) Once the signed Judgment is returned to the clerk, the clerk will enter the Judgment and create a judgment lien. When paid in full, the clerk shall note that fact in the judgment lien record and change the judgment status to "satisfied". IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that these procedures do not apply to a request for waiver or deferral of fees and costs filed by an inmate subject to the provisions of ORS 30.642 to 30.650…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine OCR, unreviewed; recognition errors and lost amendment markings are possible. Verify the original PDF.
Captured 2026-10-18T23:00:01.762234+00:00 · Retained from official publisher listing. Operative status, amendments, rescissions, and case applicability remain unreviewed. First page expressly states this amended PJO 16-02 supersedes PJO 15-02. Machine OCR generated 2026-10-18T23:03:56.153396+00:00 with tesseract v5.5.3.20260724; unreviewed recognition errors and lost layout/markings remain. Verify the original.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_ocr_unreviewed
SHA-256 73001799ffb8a3848b0089f105c2c2d4959c9062b99f1d60d8a30dc701f5f69f
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/courts/coos/resources/GeneralOrders/PJO 2016-02 Fee Deferral WaiverCivil Action-Amended.pdf
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules — physical PDF page 96
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules · physical PDF page 96 · 2026
A-38 2. 3.170—ASSOCIATION OF OUT -OF-STATE COUNSEL (PRO HAC VICE) Amended out of cycle to increase the pro hac vice application fee. ACTION TAKEN Amendment of the rule was preliminarily recommended by consensus at the UTCR Committee’s fall meeting on October 24, 2025. The rule was then amended out of cycle by SCO 25-054, effective January 1, 2026. EXPLANATION This proposal was submitted by Myah Kehoe, President of OSB, on behalf of the OSB Board of Governors. It amends UTCR 3.170(6) to increase the pro hac vice application fee from $500 to $750 dollars, effective January 1, 2026. At the fall 2025 meeting, the proponent provided testimony explaining the need for the fee increase as follows. The pro hac vice application fee has not been increased since July 1, 2014, when it was raised to $500. Increasing the fee to $750 reflects inflationary increases and aligns the fee with the current administrative costs associated with processing pro hac vice applications. According to Consumer Price…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T22:31:09.969140+00:00 · Chief Justice amendment order effective 2026-08-01; original amendment document, not consolidated rule text Only approved-change pages1-25 and out-of-cycle amendment pages94-101 are indexed. Disapproved proposals, deferred recommendations and administrative actions on pages26-93 and102-105 remain source context only. This packet is not consolidated rule text; dates differ by provision.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 4d3584770d44af58f80c4ebf07da611b26a865195202c369dba2f465261fb0a5
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/UTCR/CJO_2026-021.pdf
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules — physical PDF page 101
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules · physical PDF page 101 · 2026
A-43 (c) A separate petition for waiver must be filed in each judicial district in which the person desires a waiver. (d) If the court grants a petition for waiver, the bar [member]{licensee} obtaining the waiver must (i) File a copy of the court’s order in each case subject to the waiver; and (ii) Include the words “Exempt from eFiling per Waiver Granted [DATE]” in the caption of all documents conventionally filed during the duration of the waiver. (e) If the court grants a motion for waiver, the bar [member]{licensee} obtaining the waiver must include the words “Exempt from eFiling per Waiver Granted [DATE]” in the caption of all documents conventionally filed in the case. (3) If the electronic filing system is continuously unavailable for a period of more than 24 hours, an active [member]{licensee} of the Oregon State Bar may file documents using conventional filing until the end of the first full business day after the day on which the electronic filing system becomes available. * …
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T22:31:09.969140+00:00 · Chief Justice amendment order effective 2026-08-01; original amendment document, not consolidated rule text Only approved-change pages1-25 and out-of-cycle amendment pages94-101 are indexed. Disapproved proposals, deferred recommendations and administrative actions on pages26-93 and102-105 remain source context only. This packet is not consolidated rule text; dates differ by provision.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 4d3584770d44af58f80c4ebf07da611b26a865195202c369dba2f465261fb0a5
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/UTCR/CJO_2026-021.pdf
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules — physical PDF page 100
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules · physical PDF page 100 · 2026
A-42 5. 21.140—MANDATORY ELECTRONIC FILING Changed references from “member” to “licensee.” See related items D.1 and D.3–D.4. ACTION TAKEN Amendment of the rule was preliminarily recommended by consensus at the UTCR Committee’s fall meeting on October 24, 2025. The rule was then amended out of cycle by CJO 25-051, effective January 1, 2026. No public comments were received. EXPLANATION See also the background explanation for related item D.1. The amendment to UTCR 21.140(1)–(3) changed “member” to “licensee” to conform to SB 166. The committee agreed by consensus to recommend approval of the amendment out of cycle to align with the effective date of SB 166. AMENDMENT 21.140 MANDATORY ELECTRONIC FILING (1) An active [member]{licensee} of the Oregon State Bar must file a document using the electronic filing system, instead of using conventional filing, unless: (a) The document is required to be conventionally filed under UTCR 21.070(3); or (b) The filer has obtained a waiver under subsec…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T22:31:09.969140+00:00 · Chief Justice amendment order effective 2026-08-01; original amendment document, not consolidated rule text Only approved-change pages1-25 and out-of-cycle amendment pages94-101 are indexed. Disapproved proposals, deferred recommendations and administrative actions on pages26-93 and102-105 remain source context only. This packet is not consolidated rule text; dates differ by provision.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 4d3584770d44af58f80c4ebf07da611b26a865195202c369dba2f465261fb0a5
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/UTCR/CJO_2026-021.pdf
In The Matter of Satisfactions of Child Support Judgments — physical PDF page 1
In The Matter of Satisfactions of Child Support Judgments · physical PDF page 1 ·
a r: ?.i :.' : , IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON"' I**$ f**ij i pi* t: 5 I FOR THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT:':. .,,. i:, , .. .1....,,,,., il* ii iiil i r,'rii l ri i,;l, In the Matter of Satisfactions ) Amended General Order of Child Support Payments ) 98-04 ) ) This matter coming before the court on it's own motion; Whereas the Legislature has amended, gonsolidated and repealed certain statues relating to Judgments; and Whereas ORS 18.400 cited in General Order 98-04 has been repealed and renumbered. It IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT GENERAL ORDER 98.04 IS AMENDED TO\- READ: Pursuant to ORS 18.225 this court will file satisfactions of support payment judgments in cases where support payments are not ordered to be paid to the Department of Justice or where enforcement services are not provided pursuant to oRS. 25.080. It is so ordered this day z-?rt- of November,2006 *_--- 'F Richard L. Barron Presiding Judge
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T23:00:01.762234+00:00 · Retained from official publisher listing. Operative status, amendments, rescissions, and case applicability remain unreviewed. Only physical PDF page1, amended General Order98-04, is indexed. Page2 is expressly vacated General Order93-02 and page3 an older98-04version; both remain unindexed original-source context.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 54e6203769cc1f22aa05ea4d9f81a5dfc71248acc9b1b2891d5a9279e6cbc659
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/courts/coos/resources/GeneralOrders/98-04_satisfactionodchildsupp.pdf
Publisher order documents in this scope
These original documents include source-only scans. Confirm current status, rescissions, effective dates and the complete original.
Search this stored order
machine_ocr_unreviewed
Retained from official publisher listing. Operative status, amendments, rescissions, and case applicability remain unreviewed. Machine OCR generated 2026-10-18T23:03:56.153396+00:00 with tesseract v5.5.3.20260724; unreviewed recognition errors and lost layout/markings remain. Verify the original.
Search this stored order
source_link_only_scan_needs_ocr
Retained from official publisher listing. Operative status, amendments, rescissions, and case applicability remain unreviewed.
Search this stored order
machine_ocr_unreviewed
Retained from official publisher listing. Operative status, amendments, rescissions, and case applicability remain unreviewed. Amended PJO 21-01 retained; unamended central-library copy excluded. Machine OCR generated 2026-10-18T23:03:56.153396+00:00 with tesseract v5.5.3.20260724; unreviewed recognition errors and lost layout/markings remain. Verify the original. Only physical PDF page 1 is the local amended PJO 21-01. Pages 2-3 are attached statewide CJO 21-043 and are retained as source context only, excluded from county rule text indexing pending separate scope and currentness review.
Search this stored order
machine_ocr_unreviewed
Retained from official publisher listing. Operative status, amendments, rescissions, and case applicability remain unreviewed. First page expressly states this amended PJO 16-02 supersedes PJO 15-02. Machine OCR generated 2026-10-18T23:03:56.153396+00:00 with tesseract v5.5.3.20260724; unreviewed recognition errors and lost layout/markings remain. Verify the original.