Court visitor order: Columbia (06.09.2023).pdf — physical PDF page 1
Court visitor order: Columbia (06.09.2023).pdf · physical PDF page 1 ·
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STA TE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF COLUMBIA IN THE MATTER OF ) ) ORDER ESTABLISHING ) QUALIFICATIONS, STANDARDS , AND ) FEES FOR COURT VISITORS ) _______________ ) Presiding Judge Order Number 23-05 Pursuant to ORS 125.165 and 125.170 (2), IT IS HEREB Y ORDERED THAT: 1) Court Visitors shall have the following qualifications: a. A license in good standing from any state in any of the following areas: licen sed professional counselor ; licensed marriage and family therapist; licensed clinical social workers; registered nurse ; attorney; or b. A Post-graduate degree (e.g. MSW , MSN, other master 's degree, J.D.) and at least two years of relevant experience. c. The Presiding Judge or their designee shall determine whether the proposed visitor's experience under l )b. above is sufficient. 2) The Presiding Judge or their designee shall have the sole and absolute discretion to place a person on the approved visitor's list or remove a person from the approved visit…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T23:01:50.110212+00:00 · Retained from official OJD county-specific court visitor library. Library dates are document labels, not verified effective dates; operative status and case applicability remain unreviewed.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 e39eac3f3aab77ee86210f23268042be010f89ee3bff6fc7dfd7cc08d62a211d
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/programs/family/guardianship-conservatorship/Documents/Columbia%20(06.09.2023).pdf
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules — physical PDF page 19
CJO 2026-021 — Adoption of Amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules · physical PDF page 19 · 2026
A-18 “b. [ ] I received objections that I could not resolve with a party despite reasonable efforts to do so. I have filed a copy of the objections I received and indicated which objections remain unresolved. “c. [ ] After conferring about objections, [role and name of objecting party] agreed to independently file any remaining objection. “4. [ ] Service is not required pursuant to subsection (3) of this rule, or by {the following }statute, rule, or otherwise{: }. “5. [ ] Each other party previously filed a waiver of appearance. “6. [ ] This is a proposed judgment that includes an award of punitive damages and notice has been served on the Director of the Crime Victims’ Assistance Section as required by subsection (5) of this rule. “7. [ ] Other: _______________________________________.” (3) The requirements of subsection (1) of this rule do not apply to: (a) A proposed order or judgment presented in open court with the parties present; (b) A proposed order or judgment for which servic…
Open publisher PDF at this page ↗ · Read complete stored excerpt
Machine-extracted PDF text, unreviewed.
Captured 2026-10-18T22:31:09.969140+00:00 · Chief Justice amendment order effective 2026-08-01; original amendment document, not consolidated rule text Only approved-change pages1-25 and out-of-cycle amendment pages94-101 are indexed. Disapproved proposals, deferred recommendations and administrative actions on pages26-93 and102-105 remain source context only. This packet is not consolidated rule text; dates differ by provision.
Publisher order or amendment document. Deleted/added wording and operative scope must be read in the original; do not treat every extracted sentence as an active rule.
Source provenance
machine_extracted_unreviewed
SHA-256 4d3584770d44af58f80c4ebf07da611b26a865195202c369dba2f465261fb0a5
Publisher URL: https://www.courts.oregon.gov/rules/UTCR/CJO_2026-021.pdf