Legal Resource Navigator

ORS 164.105 — Right of possession

Oregon criminal law — ORS Title 16 (2025 snapshot) · legal_authorities

ORS 164.105 — Right of possession

164.105 Right of possession. Right of possession of property is as follows: (1) A person who has obtained possession of property by theft or other illegal means shall be deemed to have a right of possession superior to that of another person who takes, obtains or withholds the property from that person by means of theft. (2) A joint or common owner of property shall not be deemed to have a right of possession of the property superior to that of any other joint or common owner of the property. (3) In the absence of a specific agreement to the contrary, a person in lawful possession of property shall be deemed to have a right of possession superior to that of a person having only a security interest in the property, even if legal title to the property lies with the holder of the security interest pursuant to a conditional sale contract or other security agreement. [1971 c.743 §130; 1987 c.158 §28]

Source: Oregon Legislature — ORS 2025 Edition, Chapter 164 · ORS 164.105

Stored review status: 2025_edition_later_amendments_unresolved. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.

Official chapter context and edition notices
Chapter 164 — Offenses Against Property ORS sections in this chapter were amended or repealed by the Legislative Assembly during its 2026 regular session. See the table of ORS sections amended or repealed during the 2026 regular session: 2026 A&R Tables New sections of law were enacted by the Legislative Assembly during its 2026 regular session and pertain to or are likely to be compiled in this ORS chapter. See sections in the following 2026 Oregon Laws chapters: 2026 Session Laws 0014 ; 2026 Session Laws 0053 ; 2026 Session Laws 0067 2025 EDITION OFFENSES AGAINST PROPERTY CRIMES AND PUNISHMENTS DEFINITIONS THEFT AND RELATED OFFENSES MAIL-RELATED OFFENSES MONEY LAUNDERING BURGLARY AND CRIMINAL TRESPASS ARSON, CRIMINAL MISCHIEF AND RELATED OFFENSES GRAFFITI-RELATED OFFENSES ROBBERY LITTERING UNLAWFUL TRANSPORT MISCELLANEOUS DEFINITIONS
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged

Download original chapter HTML file

File SHA-256: 4f233e8c2845121d92478a7eeb1ecc446ff209639f33f26a4f75386ddc5638f3. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. This page displays the selected Oregon section record with its printed versions and adjoining notes. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.

Authority boundary: official snapshot extraction not current law verified.

Open the recorded source website ↗

Record provenance

Stable record: oregon_criminal_law:legal_authorities:164.105
Source file: ors164.html
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: e06b242aa08aeb048dd05a95cc5948086744fd6cd994862ca86ca7c7cab5cfcc
Retained source evidence SHA-256: 4f233e8c2845121d92478a7eeb1ecc446ff209639f33f26a4f75386ddc5638f3

Source location: ORS 164.105 (all printed versions and notes)

Stored source content

164.105 Right of possession. Right of possession of property is as follows: (1) A person who has obtained possession of property by theft or other illegal means shall be deemed to have a right of possession superior to that of another person who takes, obtains or withholds the property from that person by means of theft. (2) A joint or common owner of property shall not be deemed to have a right of possession of the property superior to that of any other joint or common owner of the property. (3) In the absence of a specific agreement to the contrary, a person in lawful possession of property shall be deemed to have a right of possession superior to that of a person having only a security interest in the property, even if legal title to the property lies with the holder of the security interest pursuant to a conditional sale contract or other security agreement. [1971 c.743 §130; 1987 c.158 §28]

Cross-references

Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.

No explicit source connection was found. This does not mean there are no relevant authorities.