Legal Resource Navigator

ORS 163.192 — Endangering a person protected by a Family Abuse Prevention Act restraining order

Oregon criminal law — ORS Title 16 (2025 snapshot) · legal_authorities

ORS 163.192 — Endangering a person protected by a Family Abuse Prevention Act restraining order

163.192 Endangering a person protected by a Family Abuse Prevention Act restraining order. (1) A person commits the crime of endangering a person protected by a Family Abuse Prevention Act restraining order if the person: (a) Has been served with the order as provided in ORS 107.718, unless service was waived under ORS 107.720 because the person appeared before the court; (b) Intentionally engaged in conduct prohibited by the order while the order was in effect; and (c) By engaging in the prohibited conduct, recklessly created a substantial risk of physical injury to a person protected by the order, or intentionally attempted to place a person protected by the order in fear of imminent physical injury. (2) Endangering a person protected by a Family Abuse Prevention Act restraining order is a Class C felony. [2015 c.527 §2] Note: 163.192 was added to and made a part of 163.160 to 163.208 by legislative action but was not added to any smaller series therein. See Preface to Oregon Revised Statutes for further explanation.

Source: Oregon Legislature — ORS 2025 Edition, Chapter 163 · ORS 163.192

Stored review status: 2025_edition_later_amendments_unresolved. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.

Official chapter context and edition notices
Chapter 163 — Offenses Against Persons 2025 EDITION OFFENSES AGAINST PERSONS CRIMES AND PUNISHMENTS HOMICIDE ASSAULT AND RELATED OFFENSES KIDNAPPING AND RELATED OFFENSES COERCION SEXUAL OFFENSES OFFENSES AGAINST FAMILY VISUAL RECORDING OF SEXUAL CONDUCT OF CHILDREN INVASION OF PRIVACY MISCELLANEOUS STALKING SEXUAL ABUSE RESTRAINING ORDERS HOMICIDE
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged

Download original chapter HTML file

File SHA-256: 81109a43a5631ebec4ebfde641092a6c60ecd13ec77452c9939b53ff86a4d40c. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. This page displays the selected Oregon section record with its printed versions and adjoining notes. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.

Authority boundary: official snapshot extraction not current law verified.

Open the recorded source website ↗

Record provenance

Stable record: oregon_criminal_law:legal_authorities:163.192
Source file: ors163.html
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: a1ca53223ef3866d119c8f17bb2313c2cf42a88579223d5902c42a5f5560b35a
Retained source evidence SHA-256: 81109a43a5631ebec4ebfde641092a6c60ecd13ec77452c9939b53ff86a4d40c

Source location: ORS 163.192 (all printed versions and notes)

Stored source content

163.192 Endangering a person protected by a Family Abuse Prevention Act restraining order. (1) A person commits the crime of endangering a person protected by a Family Abuse Prevention Act restraining order if the person: (a) Has been served with the order as provided in ORS 107.718, unless service was waived under ORS 107.720 because the person appeared before the court; (b) Intentionally engaged in conduct prohibited by the order while the order was in effect; and (c) By engaging in the prohibited conduct, recklessly created a substantial risk of physical injury to a person protected by the order, or intentionally attempted to place a person protected by the order in fear of imminent physical injury. (2) Endangering a person protected by a Family Abuse Prevention Act restraining order is a Class C felony. [2015 c.527 §2] Note: 163.192 was added to and made a part of 163.160 to 163.208 by legislative action but was not added to any smaller series therein. See Preface to Oregon Revised Statutes for further explanation.

Cross-references

Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.

No explicit source connection was found. This does not mean there are no relevant authorities.