Legal Resource Navigator

ORS 161.055 — Burden of proof as to defenses

Oregon criminal law — ORS Title 16 (2025 snapshot) · legal_authorities

ORS 161.055 — Burden of proof as to defenses

161.055 Burden of proof as to defenses. (1) When a “defense,” other than an “affirmative defense” as defined in subsection (2) of this section, is raised at a trial, the state has the burden of disproving the defense beyond a reasonable doubt. (2) When a defense, declared to be an “affirmative defense” by chapter 743, Oregon Laws 1971, is raised at a trial, the defendant has the burden of proving the defense by a preponderance of the evidence. (3) The state is not required to negate a defense as defined in subsection (1) of this section unless it is raised by the defendant. “Raised by the defendant” means either notice in writing to the state before commencement of trial or affirmative evidence by a defense witness in the defendant’s case in chief. [1971 c.743 §4] Note: See note under 161.015.

Source: Oregon Legislature — ORS 2025 Edition, Chapter 161 · ORS 161.055

Stored review status: 2025_edition_later_amendments_unresolved. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.

Official chapter context and edition notices
TITLE 16 CRIMES AND PUNISHMENTS Chapter 161. General Provisions 162. Offenses Against the State and Public Justice 163. Offenses Against Persons 163A. Sex Offender Reporting and Classification 164. Offenses Against Property 165. Offenses Involving Fraud or Deception 166. Offenses Against Public Order; Firearms and Other Weapons; Racketeering 167. Offenses Against General Welfare and Animals 169. Local and Regional Correctional Facilities; Prisoners; Juvenile Facilities _______________ Chapter 161 — General Provisions Uncodified sections printed in this chapter were amended or repealed by the Legislative Assembly during its 2026 regular session. See the table of uncodified sections amended or repealed during the 2026 regular session: 2026 A&R Tables 2025 EDITION GENERAL PROVISIONS CRIMES AND PUNISHMENTS PRINCIPLES CRIMINAL LIABILITY PARTIES TO CRIME JUSTIFICATION RESPONSIBILITY (Temporary provisions relating to maximum periods of commitment and community restoration are compiled as notes following ORS 161.371) INCHOATE CRIMES CLASSES OF OFFENSES DISPOSITION OF OFFENDERS AUTHORITY OF SENTENCING COURT PRINCIPLES
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged

Download original chapter HTML file

File SHA-256: 8773685681f1bf26a63d62a05c338a6e76c17f6dd1b69da0a77625951fdf2fe5. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. This page displays the selected Oregon section record with its printed versions and adjoining notes. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.

Authority boundary: official snapshot extraction not current law verified.

Open the recorded source website ↗

Record provenance

Stable record: oregon_criminal_law:legal_authorities:161.055
Source file: ors161.html
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: aee5e5708b10ee8f9df095e5c75cb574c19fae1b15533d34e1917708ced873ca
Retained source evidence SHA-256: 8773685681f1bf26a63d62a05c338a6e76c17f6dd1b69da0a77625951fdf2fe5

Source location: ORS 161.055 (all printed versions and notes)

Stored source content

161.055 Burden of proof as to defenses. (1) When a “defense,” other than an “affirmative defense” as defined in subsection (2) of this section, is raised at a trial, the state has the burden of disproving the defense beyond a reasonable doubt. (2) When a defense, declared to be an “affirmative defense” by chapter 743, Oregon Laws 1971, is raised at a trial, the defendant has the burden of proving the defense by a preponderance of the evidence. (3) The state is not required to negate a defense as defined in subsection (1) of this section unless it is raised by the defendant. “Raised by the defendant” means either notice in writing to the state before commencement of trial or affirmative evidence by a defense witness in the defendant’s case in chief. [1971 c.743 §4] Note: See note under 161.015.

Cross-references

Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.

No explicit source connection was found. This does not mean there are no relevant authorities.