§ 14. Sale, etc., on agreement not to use goods of
competitor
It shall be unlawful for any person engaged in
commerce, in the course of such commerce, to
lease or make a sale or contract for sale of
goods, wares, merchandise, machinery, supplies,
or other commodities, whether patented or
unpatented, for use, consumption, or resale
within the United States or any Territory there-
of or the District of Columbia or any insular
possession or other place under the jurisdiction
of the United States, or fix a price charged
therefor, or discount from, or rebate upon, such
price, on the condition, agreement, or under-
standing that the lessee or purchaser thereof
shall not use or deal in the goods, wares, mer-
chandise, machinery, supplies, or other com-
modities of a competitor or competitors of the
lessor or seller, where the effect of such lease,
sale, or contract for sale or such condition,
agreement, or understanding may be to substan-
tially lessen competition or tend to create a mo-
nopoly in any line of commerce.
(Oct. 15, 1914, ch. 323, § 3, 38 Stat. 731.)
§ 15. Suits by persons injured
(a) Amount of recovery; prejudgment interest
Except as provided in subsection (b), any per-
son who shall be injured in his business or prop-
erty by reason of anything forbidden in the anti-
trust laws may sue therefor in any district court
of the United States in the district in which the
defendant resides or is found or has an agent,
without respect to the amount in controversy,
and shall recover threefold the damages by him
sustained, and the cost of suit, including a rea-
sonable attorney’s fee. The court may award
under this section, pursuant to a motion by such
person promptly made, simple interest on actual
damages for the period beginning on the date
File SHA-256: 6723e642a3917a647bf95a552a71b1f99f2d948d5c009c10cee94bd75db9c0aa. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. This page displays the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:uscode2024_0a081749e36c5e7fd58ff789 Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-15/section-14-sale-etc-on-agreement-not-to-use-goods-of--efc9ea95d5.md Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded Passage SHA-256: 9f9b1fb2f2ea7fee6b683551fea409bf72607e5c18323a50917a5f71edee0d42 Retained source evidence SHA-256: 6723e642a3917a647bf95a552a71b1f99f2d948d5c009c10cee94bd75db9c0aa
Page 22
TITLE 15—COMMERCE AND TRADE
§ 13c
§ 13c. Exemption of non-profit institutions from
price discrimination provisions
Nothing in the Act approved June 19, 1936,
known as the Robinson-Patman Antidiscrimina-
tion Act, shall apply to purchases of their sup-
plies for their own use by schools, colleges, uni-
versities, public libraries, churches, hospitals,
and charitable institutions not operated for
profit.
(May 26, 1938, ch. 283, 52 Stat. 446.)
Editorial Notes
REFERENCES IN TEXT
The Act approved June 19, 1936, known as the Robin-
son-Patman Antidiscrimination Act, referred to in
text, is act June 19, 1936, ch. 592, 49 Stat. 1526, also
known as the Robinson-Patman Price Discrimination
Act, which enacted sections 13a, 13b, and 21a of this
title and amended section 13 of this title. For complete
classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title
note set out under section 13 of this title and Tables.
§ 14. Sale, etc., on agreement not to use goods of
competitor
It shall be unlawful for any person engaged in
commerce, in the course of such commerce, to
lease or make a sale or contract for sale of
goods, wares, merchandise, machinery, supplies,
or other commodities, whether patented or
unpatented, for use, consumption, or resale
within the United States or any Territory there-
of or the District of Columbia or any insular
possession or other place under the jurisdiction
of the United States, or fix a price charged
therefor, or discount from, or rebate upon, such
price, on the condition, agreement, or under-
standing that the lessee or purchaser thereof
shall not use or deal in the goods, wares, mer-
chandise, machinery, supplies, or other com-
modities of a competitor or competitors of the
lessor or seller, where the effect of such lease,
sale, or contract for sale or such condition,
agreement, or understanding may be to substan-
tially lessen competition or tend to create a mo-
nopoly in any line of commerce.
(Oct. 15, 1914, ch. 323, § 3, 38 Stat. 731.)
§ 15. Suits by persons injured
(a) Amount of recovery; prejudgment interest
Except as provided in subsection (b), any per-
son who shall be injured in his business or prop-
erty by reason of anything forbidden in the anti-
trust laws may sue therefor in any district court
of the United States in the district in which the
defendant resides or is found or has an agent,
without respect to the amount in controversy,
and shall recover threefold the damages by him
sustained, and the cost of suit, including a rea-
sonable attorney’s fee. The court may award
under this section, pursuant to a motion by such
person promptly made, simple interest on actual
damages for the period beginning on the date of
service of such person’s pleading setting forth a
claim under the antitrust laws and ending on
the date of judgment, or for any shorter period
therein, if the court finds that the award of such
interest for such period is just in the cir-
cumstances. In determining whether an award of
interest under this section for any period is just
in the circumstances, the court shall consider
only—
(1) whether such person or the opposing
party, or either party’s representative, made
motions or asserted claims or defenses so lack-
ing in merit as to show that such party or rep-
resentative acted intentionally for delay, or
otherwise acted in bad faith;
(2) whether, in the course of the action in-
volved, such person or the opposing party, or
either party’s representative, violated any ap-
plicable rule, statute, or court order providing
for sanctions for dilatory behavior or other-
wise providing for expeditious proceedings;
and
(3) whether such person or the opposing
party, or either party’s representative, en-
gaged in conduct primarily for the purpose of
delaying the litigation or increasing the cost
thereof.
(b) Amount of damages payable to foreign states
and instrumentalities of foreign states
(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), any
person who is a foreign state may not recover
under subsection (a) an amount in excess of the
actual damages sustained by it and the cost of
suit, including a reasonable attorney’s fee.
(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to a foreign
state if—
(A) such foreign state would be denied, under
section 1605(a)(2) of title 28, immunity in a
case in which the action is based upon a com-
mercial activity, or an act, that is the subject
matter of its claim under this section;
(B) such foreign state waives all defenses
based upon or arising out of its status as a for-
eign state, to any claims brought against it in
the same action;
(C) such foreign state engages primarily in
commercial activities; and
(D) such foreign state does not function,
with respect to the commercial activity, or
the act, that is the subject matter of its claim
under this section as a procurement entity for
itself or for another foreign state.
(c) Definitions
For purposes of this section—
(1) the term ‘‘commercial activity’’ shall
have the meaning given it in section 1603(d) of
title 28, and
(2) the term ‘‘foreign state’’ shall have the
meaning given it in section 1603(a) of title 28.
(Oct. 15, 1914, ch. 323, § 4, 38 Stat. 731; Pub. L.
96–349, § 4(a)(1), Sept. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 1156; Pub.
L. 97–393, Dec. 29, 1982, 96 Stat. 1964.)
Editorial Notes
REFERENCES IN TEXT
The antitrust laws, referred to in subsec. (a), are de-
fined in section 12 of this title.
PRIOR PROVISIONS
Section supersedes two former similar sections en-
acted by act July 2, 1890, ch. 647, § 7, 26 Stat. 210, and act
Aug. 27, 1894, ch. 349, § 77, 28 Stat. 570, each of which
were restricted in operation to the particular act cited.
Section 7 of act July 2, 1890, was repealed by act July
7, 1955, ch. 283, § 3, 69 Stat. 283, effective six months
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
It shall be unlawful for any person engaged in commerce, in the course of such commerce, to lease or make a sale or contract for sale of goods, wares, merchandise, machinery, supplies, or other commodities, whether patented or unpatented, for use, consumption, or resale within the United States or any Territory thereof or the District of Columbia or any insular possession or other place under the jurisdiction of the United States, or fix a price charged therefor, or discount from, or rebate upon, such price, on the condition, agreement, or understanding that the lessee or purchaser thereof shall not use or deal in the goods, wares, merchandise, machinery, supplies, or other commodities of a competitor or competitors of the lessor or seller, where the effect of such lease, sale, or contract for sale or such condition, agreement, or understanding may be to substantially lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly in any line of commerce.